Magazine
Latest Issue

League tables of school results are often criticised for being simplistic. What many educationalists want to see instead are “added value” tables. These would take account of the abilities of pupils when they join the school and thus reflect the difference the school has made to them. However, new research from Cambridge University suggests that this may not be the full answer. It reports that 45 per cent of pupils are actually worse at reading after a year at secondary school, compared to when they left primary school. In other words, we may be forced to measure “subtracted value”, too.

Register today to continue reading

You’ve hit your limit of three articles in the last 30 days. To get seven more, simply enter your email address below.

You’ll also receive our free e-book Prospect’s Top Thinkers 2020 and our newsletter with the best new writing on politics, economics, literature and the arts.

Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with newsletters, subscription offers and other relevant information.

Click here to learn more about these purposes and how we use your data. You will be able to opt-out of further contact on the next page and in all our communications.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to letters@prospect-magazine.co.uk

More From Prospect