No, the British Empire isn’t something to be proud of—in fact, it’s still causing harm today

From China to Iraq, we kid ourselves when we downplay the effects of Empire

by Daniel York Loh / July 21, 2017 / Leave a comment

Iraqi refugees queue for food and water. The country was formed by British colonisers. Photo: PA

A recent YouGov poll revealed that 59 per cent of Britons think the Empire is something to be proud of. They also tend to think it left its colonies better off. A third would like it to still exist.

This is possibly not surprising. Many of the people asked for their opinions in that survey would probably agree that they don’t believe they’ve experienced any blights of the Empire directly. Indeed, it’s clear that many people in this country (like most other countries in the Western world) have benefited enormously from the vast profits of colonial exploitation—at the expense of other nations.

Take a country like Iraq, for instance. Iraq was created by the British Empire by amalgamating three Ottoman provinces (Mosul, Baghdad and Basra) under the Sykes-Picot agreement—an agreement which made sure to keep oil-rich Mosul out of the equally colonial hands of the French government. The British authorities then placed favourable elites in charge of the governance of this racially and religiously divided region. How anyone could expect that to proceed happily is quite beyond me.

YOU'VE HIT THE LIMIT

You have now reached your limit of 3 free articles in the last 30 days.
But don't worry! You can get another 7 articles absolutely free, si mply by entering your email address in the box below.

When you register we'll also send you a free e-book—Writing with punch—which includes some of the finest writing from our archive of 22 years. And we'll also send you a weekly newsletter with the best new ideas in politics and philosophy of culture, which you can of course unsubscribe from at any time

Prospect takes your privacy seriously. We promise never to rent or sell your e-mail address to any third party.
You can unsubscribe from the Prospect e-mail newsletter at any time.

DEBUG messsage: regular

How should Britain engage with Russia?

Crispin Blunt / March 16, 2017

We can no longer assume that London and Washington agree on Moscow

The Manchester attack revealed crucial differences in how the British and American press operate

Calder Walton / May 30, 2017

As questions continue to be asked of MI5, it's worth reflecting on how the press treats...

Comments

jimmymack
July 21, 2017 at 23:27
“Be it so. This burning of widows is your custom; prepare the funeral pile. But my nation has also a custom. When men burn women alive we hang them, and confiscate all their property. My carpenters shall therefore erect gibbets on which to hang all concerned when the widow is consumed. Let us all act according to national customs." Charles James Napier, Major General to the command of the Indian army. (1851). I'm on the side of the 59 per cent, Daniel. We taught the world. You should keep moaning about the British empire though. As things stand, it'll keep you in remittances from liberal publications for decades to come. And British guilt will also ensure that millions of your fellow British empire 'victims' will get a favourable passage when they unaccountably want to come to this spawn of Satan country. Get real. History happened. You're doing OK. I (Irish extraction) have moved on. You should do the same.
Reply
BillMason
July 22, 2017 at 11:47
Charles James Napier also said:"The best way to quiet a country is a good thrashing."Selectively editing our history so that only the good parts remain is exactly what Daniel's talking about.
Reply
1. JimmieMack
  August 12, 2017 at 22:16
  Yes, Bill. But we've had 50 years of selective editing so that only the worst bits remain.
  Reply
pounce
July 22, 2017 at 22:38
Iraqi refugees queue for food and water. The country was formed by British colonisers.Actually it wasn't it was a League of Nations mandate,
Reply
D J G.
July 24, 2017 at 18:55
While there is no doubt that many actions of the British Empire were reprehensible and many of its statements viewed through 21st century ethical eyes are hypocritical, the challenge has to be what alternative government structure would have been in place with the enormous technological changes affecting countries. It is not a simple matter!
Reply
Barnie
July 25, 2017 at 08:51
I dont agree with the article. If the British Empire wouldnt exist there would be no power balance in Europe and in the world. The British Empire won crucial wars against world tyrants like Kaiser Wilhem, Philip the Second, Hitler and Napoleon. British Empire has given democracy to half of the world, including the United States. Of course had been misgivings, errors and crimes. But the balance is clearly positive.
Reply
1. ed
  July 30, 2017 at 21:52
  The problem is that we are not able to see alternative outcomes. You are trying to find the positives in what has happened, which is fair enough. We like to think that democracy cant be bettered but its often just a smokescreen. What we can see is that large parts of the African continent are still struggling very badly from the effects of European colonisation. A ghost that is repeatedly coming back to haunt us. Hitler was a result of the First world war which followed on from various empire jossling.
  Reply
2. ed
  July 30, 2017 at 21:56
  The British Empire WAS the tyrant. We just have a skewed version of our own history because we chose to believe that others are morally inferior. Go look at our involvement with Leopold of Belgium in the Congo. It would make Hitler wince.
  Reply

You can log in to post a comment under your subscriber name.

Daniel York Loh

Daniel York Loh is an actor, writer and filmmaker. He has appeared at the Royal Shakespeare Company and National Theatre and is one of 21 featured writers in the award-winning best-selling essay collection The Good Immigrant