The promised radical shake-up of the school system has not materialisedby Rebecca Montacute / June 7, 2018 / Leave a comment
When free schools were introduced by the coalition government, then Education Secretary Michael Gove promoted the programme as a way to bring innovation into schools. In 2011, he commented that “innovation, diversity and flexibility are at the heart of the free schools’ policy. We want the dynamism that characterises the best independent schools to help drive up standards in the state sector.” The coalition government argued that innovation and diversity in schools would increase the competition between them, and that this in turn would drive up standards.
Free schools can be set up by groups of parents, charities, universities, religious groups, teachers or businesses. They are all-ability schools, funded by the government, but are not run by local councils and have the same legal status as academies. They also have more flexibility than traditional schools, for instance in the length of their school day and in how much they pay their staff. Unlike local authority schools, they are not required to follow the national curriculum.
A number of innovative schools—those which have a genuinely novel approach to their teaching or curriculum, which is embedded throughout the school—have been set up under the free school policy. For example at the Judith Kerr primary school, a bilingual school, German language and culture is embedded throughout the curriculum, and at the Rural Enterprise Academy, students study subjects like agriculture and animal management alongside academic subjects.