• Home
  • About us
  • Contact Us
  • Date/Time
  • Login
  • Subscribe

logo

  • Home
  • Politics
  • Economics & Finance
  • World
  • Arts & Books
  • Life
  • Science
  • Philosophy
  • Subscribe
  • Events
Home
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • Politics
  • Economics & Finance
  • World
  • Arts & Books
  • Life
  • Science
  • Philosophy
  • Subscribe
  • Events
  • Home
  • Economics & Finance

Abandoning Brexit would give us a chance to implement three vital social reforms 

Without the distraction of leaving, ministers could get on with fixing social care, universal credit and further education 

by Paul Wallace / January 18, 2019 / Leave a comment
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Email

Free of Brexit distractions, ministers could work on clearing up the Universal Credit mess. Photo: Kirsty O’Connor/PA Wire/PA Images

Imagine for a moment that Brexit does not happen after all. Quite apart from the economic and strategic virtues of remaining in the EU, the government could focus on the real problems facing the country. Ministers have been ducking crucial decisions in their all-consuming preoccupation with Brexit. The blight is especially notable in social policy where there are three overriding priorities for action.

First, sort out a new system of financing adult social care in England, which has become desperately underfunded as well as unfair. This long delayed reform is vital not just for the many elderly individuals who rely upon such support but for the NHS. Lack of social care causes bed-blocking as hospitals cannot discharge vulnerable patients. Like a referred pain, cuts in the budgets of local authorities responsible for social care hurt the health service as well.

A solution must include the cap on lifetime care costs first recommended by the Dilnot Commission in 2011 (and controversially missing from Theresa May’s election manifesto of May 2017, leading her proposal to be dubbed a “dementia tax”). This would address the inequity in the current means-tested system, which can leave some people who require lengthy care in residential homes facing frightening bills. At present there is no viable way to insure against this risk in the private market because of the many uncertainties about potential costs. And by the time most people recognise the need for protection they have become risks for any insurer to shun rather than to accept.

The cap will provide a form of catastrophe insurance for those requiring prolonged expensive care. Such an approach will retain some private contribution for those who can afford it, limiting the cost to the taxpayer. Even so, the state’s contribution will rise over and above increases already needed to rectify the long squeeze on funding. That extra cost should be met if possible by higher taxes on the better-off retired rather than the working population.

As ministers take one step forward with a long overdue plan for social care they should take one step back and scrap universal credit. The usual trope is to describe this brainchild of Iain Duncan Smith (surely a warning) as a good idea in principle but poorly implemented in practice. That is far too generous. From the outset universal credit has been a bad idea, a drastic simplification of six means-tested working-age benefits to sharpen work incentives that was bound to go wrong big-time.

Essentially what the reform does is to merge two quite different forms of support for poorer people (and on top of that housing benefit). One is the traditional range of benefits for those who are out of work, whether temporarily or for longer. The other is the help provided to poor working people, especially those with children, through tax credits, which ballooned while Gordon Brown was at the Treasury. By seeking to merge these intrinsically different forms of support, the government has created a problem that won’t go away however much Amber Rudd, the latest minister to be handed this nettle, may try to neutralise its sting.

That sting is the system of monthly assessment and payment, which is built in to the design of universal credit in order to mirror the world of work. But people who are out of work need money straightaway. That’s why their benefits are paid fortnightly. Payment a month in arrears is too long for this group. Those who are in work and receiving a top-up through universal credit should be better able to cope with monthly payment (even though in practice many will be paid by their employer more frequently). However, this group will experience hardship if their pay fluctuates a lot. If they do well in one month at work then the benefit will be reduced the following one, which may turn out to be a bad month at work. This does not occur with tax credits, which are assessed and adjusted on an annual basis with some disregard for any overpayments arising from increases in income.

As cases of financial hardship—attested in increased rent arrears and greater use of food banks as the new system has been rolled out—pile up, the government should accept that universal credit is inherently unfeasible for people whose finances are so fragile. In practice it will do little to improve overall work incentives. Instead of postponing the completion of this misconceived project, Rudd should junk it. Retaining a diversity of benefits (which can be better aligned) reflects the fact that those receiving them are also diverse in their needs, a more important mirror than universal credit’s misguided attempt to replicate the experience of jobs.

What holds back poorer working-age people is not the design of the benefit system but a lack of skills, which condemns them to low pay in the first place. That’s why a third priority is to give vocational colleges and the 16-18-year-olds and older adults that they teach the break they deserve.

Universities have been pampered over the past decade thanks to serendipity funding from student loans, much of which will never be repaid, an inconvenient truth until now conveniently overlooked in government accounting. In contrast, further education, which relies much more heavily on conventional public financing, has been starved of money. The number of learners aged 19 or over in the sector in England fell by almost a third between 2010 and 2016. That is an indictment of policy since the number should be rising as adults reskill themselves. Vocational colleges also need more resources for their 16-18-year-olds, who are typically more disadvantaged than their counterparts in schools and sixth-form colleges.

Making a success of vocational education is not for the faint hearted. The merits and defects of previous vintages of policy hardly matter given the incessant ferment in the sector, as ministers come and go and strategies chop and change. What is needed is an iron will to raise the status of further education, so that it is no longer the perennial cinderella at the ball. Ministers must above all create a stable and durable framework and financing for vocational education that provides broad, transferable skills.

If abandoning Brexit does give ministers a chance to carry out their real jobs they would do well to ponder the lessons from all three policies. Social care illustrates the vice of procrastination. Universal credit demonstrates the peril of embarking upon an over-ambitious and ill-considered project. Vocational education highlights the scourge of impatience and constant tinkering.

But these three lessons will count for little as long as Brexit dominates the political stage. Staying in the EU will help reform since the economy will be stronger and the tax base bigger. But above all abandoning Brexit will remove a gigantic distraction to good government.

Go to comments

Related articles

The Brexit chaos engulfing Whitehall
Sue Cameron / September 14, 2018
Bickering ministers provide no leadership. But officials have logic on their side, and...
There is one way out of the Brexit impasse that no one has noticed
Tom Clark / January 16, 2019
With Westminster log-jammed, the country faces being led through a crisis by an undead...
Share with friends
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Email

Comments

No comments yet

Prospect's free newsletter

The big ideas that are shaping our world—straight to your inbox. PLUS a free e-book and 7 articles of your choosing on the Prospect website.

Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with our newsletter, subscription offers and other relevant information. Click here to learn more about these purposes and how we use your data. You will be able to opt-out of further contact on the next page and in all our communications.

This Month's Magazine

Perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus.

Prospect is the leading magazine of ideas. Each month it is packed with the finest writing on politics, culture, economics and ideas. Subscribe today and join the debate.

Subscribe

Most Popular

  • Read
  • Commented

The invigorating strangeness of Friedrich Nietzsche

The naïve optimism of Liam Fox

Why I bet £1000 that a no-deal Brexit will trigger recession

The backstop debate goes round and round but there is no waking from this Brexit nightmare

Labour's Remainers could be a ticking time bomb for the party

Ruling out no deal is the wrong sort of red line

6 Comments

The Conservative Party has a problem—it’s no longer conservative

5 Comments

The overlooked dynamic at the heart of the Brexit “culture war”

2 Comments

Arlene Foster’s DUP still holds the balance of power in Westminster—so what’s their next move?

2 Comments

The impact of Brexit on services has not received nearly enough attention

2 Comments

About this author

Paul Wallace
Paul Wallace is the former European Economics Editor of the Economist. He is the author of "The Euro Experiment" (Cambridge University Press)
More by this author

More by Paul Wallace

Spreadsheet Phil delivers an autofill speech
October 1, 2018
Brexit Britain is playing chicken with the economy
September 28, 2018
The emerging crisis in emerging markets
September 6, 2018

Next Prospect events

  • Details

    Prospect Book Club—Diarmaid MacCulloch

    London, 2019-05-20

  • Details

    Prospect Book Club—Sue Prideaux

    2019-04-15

  • Details

    Prospect Book Club—Andrew Roberts

    2019-03-14

See more events

Sponsored features

  • Reforming the pension system to work for the many

  • Putting savers in the driving seat: getting the pensions dashboard right

  • To fix the housing crisis we need fresh thinking

  • Tata Steel UK: Driving innovation for the future of mobility

  • The road to zero

PrimeTime

The magazine is owned and supported by the Resolution Group, as part of its not-for-profit, public interest activities.

Follow us
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • RSS

Editorial

Editor: Tom Clark
Deputy Editor: Steve Bloomfield
Managing Editor (Arts & Books): Sameer Rahim
Head of Digital: Stephanie Boland
Deputy Digital Editor (Political Correspondent): Alex Dean
Creative Director: Mike Turner
Production Editor & Designer: Chris Tilbury
US Writer-at-Large: Sam Tanenhaus

Commercial

Commercial Director: Alex Stevenson
Head of Marketing: Paul Mortimer
Marketing and Circulations Executive: James Hawkins
Programme Coordinator: Oliver James Ward
Head of Advertising Sales: Adam Kinlan 020 3372 2934
Senior Account Manager: Dominic Slonecki 0203 372 2972

  • Home
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Acceptable Use Policy
© Prospect Publishing Limited
×
Login
Login with your subscriber account:
You need a valid subscription to login.
I am
Remember Me


Forgotten password?

Or enter with social networking:
Login to post comments using social media accounts.
  • With Twitter
  • Connect
  • With Google +
×
Register Now

Register today and access any 7 articles on the Prospect’s website for FREE in the next 30 days..
PLUS find out about the big ideas that will shape our world—with Prospect’s FREE newsletter sent to your inbox. We'll even send you our e-book—Writing with punch—with some of the finest writing from the Prospect archive, at no extra cost!

Not Now, Thanks

Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with our newsletter, subscription offers and other relevant information.

Click to learn more about these interests and how we use your data. You will be able to object to this processing on the next page and in all our communications.

×
You’ve got full access!

It looks like you are a Prospect subscriber.

Prospect subscribers have full access to all the great content on our website, including our entire archive.

If you do not know your login details, simply close this pop-up and click 'Login' on the black bar at the top of the screen, then click 'Forgotten password?', enter your email address and press 'Submit'. Your password will then be emailed to you.

Thank you for your support of Prospect and we hope that you enjoy everything the site has to offer.

This site uses cookies to improve the user experience. By using this site, you agree that we can set and use these cookies. For more details on the cookies we use and how to manage them, see our Privacy and Cookie Policy.