He is smart—which is why his imprisonment mattersby David Patrikarakos / August 19, 2016 / Leave a comment
Well, it finally happened. After almost two decades of preaching divisive hate everywhere from shopping malls to embassies to the proverbial street corner, Anjem Choudary has been tried and found guilty of inviting support for a terrorist organisation.
Choudary, often described as a “radical preacher,” had, in actuality, no religious qualifications. He was a political activist who, together with Islamist militant leader, Omar Bakri Muhammad, co-founded the Salafi Wahabi organisation, al-Muhajiroun in 1986. After Muhammad fled the UK after the 7/7 attacks (he is now in prison in Lebanon), Choudary stepped—willingly— into the limelight. His goal was simple: to turn the world, and specifically, the British state into one Islamic Caliphate ruled, accordingly, under Sharia Law.
Choudary’s worldview was binary: divided simply into the world’s of Dar al-Kufr and Dar al-Islam (world of disbelief and world of Islam). One of his favourite sayings was that “The flag of Islam will fly over Downing Street”. You were either with him or against him: a good Muslim or a Kafir (unbeliever)—damned and deserving of your fate.
But Choudary was smart. For years, police said he stayed “just within the law.” He lectured and made speeches on the need for a caliphate, on the perniciousness of non-Muslims, but he never publicly encouraged acts of violence. Instead, he poured his hate into the minds of the young and impressionable. Men like Omar Sharif, a British suicide bomber who was involved in the killing of three people at the bar “Mike’s Place” in Tel Aviv in 2003, and Michael Adebolajo, who alongside Michael Adebowale, murdered the British soldier, Lee Rigby in Woolwich in May 2013 were acolytes of Choudary; they took his words to their logical conclusion. But Choudary never gave any orders; he never called openly for murder.