Justine Greening has pledged an extra £1.3bn over two years. £2bn a year is needed simply to reverse real-terms cuts since 2015by Valentine Mulholland / July 18, 2017 / Leave a comment
Yesterday, Secretary of State for Education Justine Greening announced in parliament extra funding for schools over the next two years—to be precise, £1.3bn more than the “schools settlement” agreed in the 2015 Comprehensive Spending Review. There is no new funding for the coming academic year, which begins in September. But there is more funding from April 2018: £416m extra for 2018/19 and £884m for 2019/20. After that, there’s the promise of a new funding review, with the hope that more money will follow.
£1.3bn over two years is a step in the right direction—but this is considerably less than the additional £2bn a year needed to reverse the real terms cuts that have hit schools since 2015. The independent Institute for Fiscal Studies’ analysis is that the government’s offer represents a real-terms freeze on school budgets for the next two years.
Clearly the Secretary of State has been listening to complaints, but what’s clear is that the Treasury hasn’t been. There is no new money here from them, simply a repurposing of the Department for Education’s budgets: £315m of the new funding will come from forecast income from “sugar tax” programmes; £280m from the free schools programme; £250m from the DfE’s central programmes.
In her speech, Greening also put a big focus on securing efficiencies in schools. I don’t think the government understands the extent to which the funding crisis has already wrung potential efficiencies from school budgets. Schools will try everything before they reduce pupil contact with a teacher or classroom assistant—the fact that we’ve seen so many redundancies this year is a testament to the fact that schools have run out of options.