• Home
  • About us
  • Contact Us
  • Date/Time
  • Login
  • Subscribe

logo

  • Home
  • Politics
  • Economics & Finance
  • World
  • Arts & Books
  • Life
  • Science
  • Philosophy
  • Subscribe
  • Events
Home
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • Politics
  • Economics & Finance
  • World
  • Arts & Books
  • Life
  • Science
  • Philosophy
  • Subscribe
  • Events
  • Home
  • Magazine

Letters

by prospect / July 26, 2008 / Leave a comment
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Email

Ulster peace process 1 9th June 2008

David Trimble’s objection to the British government’s handling of the Northern Ireland peace process (June) is essentially that it did not take the side of the Ulster Unionist party (UUP). But the key to the British government’s success was its policy of neutrality, which made the status of Northern Ireland a democratic question solely for its own people. Trimble complains that the British government was not hard enough on Sinn Féin, but republicans argue that the agreement was fudged to save Trimble and the UUP from the growing electoral strength of the “extremist” DUP. British neutrality was mirrored in Dublin; President May McAleese’s husband was even sent to play golf with UDA “brigadiers.” These things were necessary. As Jonathan Powell (May) put it, the Troubles were “a struggle between two traditions for recognition and influence.” The agreement was a belated coming to terms with reality.

Sean Swan Gonzaga University, Spokane

Ulster peace process 2 11th June 2008

David Trimble was a remarkable leader of the UUP, but I disagree with three of his criticisms of my book. The book was deliberately written from my diaries and contemporary government papers to avoid the trap of hindsight. David, in his comments, has fallen into that trap.

First, contrary to what David says, the Good Friday agreement was ambiguous on the issue of decommissioning. It had to be, because the gap between Sinn Féin and the UUP was too wide in 1998, and the only way to bridge it was through constructive ambiguity. The period from 1998 to 2003 therefore had to be dedicated to negotiations on decommissioning, rather than on implementation, as David knows because he participated.

Second, David thinks we should have been tougher on republicans in this period because he believes there was no prospect of the IRA going back to violence after Omagh. That was not the judgement of the British government at the time, on the basis of all the information that was available to us. We were not going to give in to the threat of violence, but we did not want to tip Northern Ireland back into the Troubles by miscalculating. And Adams and McGuinness could not deliver the IRA on anything they wanted, as David claims. The relationship was more complex. Tony Blair used to compare it to the relationship between a Labour cabinet and…

YOU’VE HIT THE LIMIT

You have now reached your limit of 3 free articles in the last 30 days.
But don’t worry! You can get another 7 articles absolutely free, simply by entering your email address in the box below.

When you register we’ll also send you a free e-book—Writing with punch—which includes some of the finest writing from our archive of 22 years. And we’ll also send you a weekly newsletter with the best new ideas in politics and philosophy of culture, which you can of course unsubscribe from at any time







Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with our newsletter, subscription offers and other relevant information.

Click to learn more about these interests and how we use your data. You will be able to object to this processing on the next page and in all our communications.

9374272905dea40c9540856.46677492

Go to comments

Related articles

Street politics: how Britain is failing a hidden cohort of homeless non-voters
James Walker / June 6, 2019
Although homeless Britons are eligible to vote, figures suggest less than 1 per cent are...
Why the Peterborough result should strike terror into the two main parties
Peter Kellner / June 7, 2019
Labour just about held on but there is huge public dissatisfaction with the traditional...
Share with friends
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Email

Comments

No comments yet

Prospect's free newsletter

The big ideas that are shaping our world—straight to your inbox. PLUS a free e-book and 7 articles of your choosing on the Prospect website.

Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with our newsletter, subscription offers and other relevant information. Click here to learn more about these purposes and how we use your data. You will be able to opt-out of further contact on the next page and in all our communications.

This Month's Magazine

Perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus.

Inside the choice facing voters this General Election—and why the commission that regulates our democracy is struggling to keep up. Plus: Clive James on Wittgenstein, and the real story of Corbynism

Subscribe

Most Popular

  • Read
  • Commented

Listen: Headspace #36—From cold war to hot peace

The politics and the substance of Labour’s new amendment to the withdrawal bill

Will the UK lose access to the European Arrest Warrant post-Brexit?

As the Brexit muddle worsens, it's time to hurry up and leave

The free schools programme is not serving the purpose for which it was designed

Ivan Rogers on Brexit: the worst is yet to come

3 Comments

How dare those signed up to hard Brexit lecture Labour on the economy?

2 Comments

The real "Sorry We Missed You"—and what the government gets wrong about the gig economy

1 Comments

A 68-seat Johnson majority: do YouGov’s startling election figures make sense?

1 Comments

Why the London result will decide the next General Election

1 Comments

About this author

prospect
More by this author

More by prospect

Seven books to read this summer
July 23, 2009
Letters
July 23, 2009
Diary
July 23, 2009

Next Prospect events

  • Details

    Prospect Book Club - David Lammy

    London, 2020-03-19

  • Details

    Prospect Book Club - Jack Shenker

    2020-02-17

  • Details

    Prospect Book Club - Amelia Gentleman

    2020-01-27

See more events

Sponsored features

  • Delivering the UK's invisible infrastructure project

  • Future of Aid: the full report

  • A forest fund for the future

  • A new humanitarianism for the modern age

  • The future of sustainable economic development

PrimeTime

The magazine is owned and supported by the Resolution Group, as part of its not-for-profit, public interest activities.

Follow us
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • RSS

Editorial

Editor: Tom Clark
Deputy Editor: Steve Bloomfield
Managing Editor (Arts & Books): Sameer Rahim
Head of Digital: Stephanie Boland
Digital Assistant: Rebecca Liu
Production Editor & Designer: Chris Tilbury
Commissioning Editor: Alex Dean
Creative Director: Mike Turner
US Writer-at-Large: Sam Tanenhaus

Commercial

Commercial Director: Alex Stevenson
Head of Marketing: Paul Mortimer
Marketing and Circulation Executive: Susan Acan
Head of Events: Victoria Jackson
Events Project Manager: Nadine Prospere
Head of Advertising Sales: Adam Kinlan 020 3372 2934
Head of Key Accounts: Scott Smith 020 3372 2972
Senior Account Manager: Patrick Lappin 020 3372 2931

  • Home
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Acceptable Use Policy
© Prospect Publishing Limited
×
Login
Login with your subscriber account:
You need a valid subscription to login.
I am
Remember Me


Forgotten password?

Or enter with social networking:
Login to post comments using social media accounts.
  • With Twitter
  • Connect
  • With Google +
×
Register Now

Register today and access any 7 articles on the Prospect’s website for FREE in the next 30 days..
PLUS find out about the big ideas that will shape our world—with Prospect’s FREE newsletter sent to your inbox. We'll even send you our e-book—Writing with punch—with some of the finest writing from the Prospect archive, at no extra cost!

Not Now, Thanks

Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with our newsletter, subscription offers and other relevant information.

Click to learn more about these interests and how we use your data. You will be able to object to this processing on the next page and in all our communications.

×
You’ve got full access!

It looks like you are a Prospect subscriber.

Prospect subscribers have full access to all the great content on our website, including our entire archive.

If you do not know your login details, simply close this pop-up and click 'Login' on the black bar at the top of the screen, then click 'Forgotten password?', enter your email address and press 'Submit'. Your password will then be emailed to you.

Thank you for your support of Prospect and we hope that you enjoy everything the site has to offer.

This site uses cookies to improve the user experience. By using this site, you agree that we can set and use these cookies. For more details on the cookies we use and how to manage them, see our Privacy and Cookie Policy.