The results of the Brexit “Citizens’ Assembly” in Manchester show thatby Alan Renwick / October 25, 2017 / Leave a comment
The British public would prefer the UK to stay in the single market and customs union than do no deal on future relations with the EU. Some politicians might be talking tough, but that is not what their voters actually want.
This, at least, is the evidence from a new exercise in deepening democratic discussion: the Citizens’ Assembly on Brexit. Unlike most measures of public opinion, citizens’ assemblies explore what people want once they have had the chance to learn about the options and think them through in detail. They thus provide deeper insights into popular preferences than we are used to.
The Citizens’ Assembly on Brexit, which focussed on the different models for leaving the EU, was run by a consortium of academics and civil society organisations. It comprised 50 members of the public who were randomly selected with the help of polling company ICM to reflect the diverse make-up of the UK electorate in terms of gender, age, ethnicity, social class, where they live and—crucially—how they voted in the referendum last year. Thus, 25 of them voted Leave and 22 Remain, while three did not vote.
The members met over two weekends in Manchester earlier this autumn. They considered their own political priorities and those of their fellow participants, heard from and questioned experts with widely varying perspectives on the best way forward, and drew on balanced briefing papers that had been vetted by an Advisory Board of Leavers, Remainers, and non-aligned professionals. They then deliberated in depth among themselves, aided by independent facilitators who ensured that everyone’s voice was heard and respected.