It wasn’t meant to be like this. In the run-up to the referendum Brexiteers were emphatic: departure from Europe would solve Britain’s woes. The project would reenergise our politics. Departure would be a breeze, and after a smooth round of negotiations we would step into a brighter future. We would control our own destiny. It would all be incredibly exciting.
Two years later and any sense of excitement has long since dissipated. There is in its place a profound feeling of national fatigue. You might expect that from Remainers; last week I met with hardline Eurosceptic Bernard Jenkin. “At the moment it feels very wearing,” he confided.
That sentiment is spreading.
Gradually the reality is sinking in: departure is impossibly complex. Having joined the European Economic Community in 1973, Britain is deeply enmeshed in the EU frameworks. Pulling us out has consumed all government bandwidth for two years and will likely do so for a lot longer. This is not the walk in the park we were promised; it is an immense technical and political challenge.
What is interesting is how the rhetoric has changed. It was subtle at first, but think: when was the last time you heard a government minister—or even a Brexiteer—proclaim the advantages of leaving? The bombast of mansion house has quietly faded away. Still there is insistence that we must leave. There is a referendum mandate to discharge. But the argument doesn’t sound like it did. There…