Ethics is invented, not encountered—why the philosophy of JL Mackie remains essential reading

Born 100 years ago this month, we still have much to learn from the thinker’s work

by James Garvey / August 4, 2017 / Leave a comment

“There are no objective values.” Not one to waste opening lines, that’s the startling first sentence of J L Mackie’s Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. (He didn’t mince words in subtitles either.) An Oxford philosopher, born in Australia 100 years ago this month, his thoughts about metaphysics, logic, and causation still get a hearing in classrooms and conference halls. But what really grabs those inside and outside the ivory tower are his arguments for atheism and scepticism about ethics. His work, worth returning to as the anniversary approaches, is filled with arguments and counter-arguments, so brace yourself for a few premises and conclusions.

YOU'VE HIT THE LIMIT

You have now reached your limit of 3 free articles in the last 30 days.
But don't worry! You can get another 7 articles absolutely free, simply by entering your email address in the box below.

When you register we'll also send you a free e-book—Writing with punch—which includes some of the finest writing from our archive of 22 years. And we'll also send you a weekly newsletter with the best new ideas in politics and philosophy of culture, which you can of course unsubscribe from at any time

Prospect takes your privacy seriously. We promise never to rent or sell your e-mail address to any third party.
You can unsubscribe from the Prospect e-mail newsletter at any time.

DEBUG messsage: regular

John Rawls died 15 years ago—here’s why you should read “A Theory of Justice”

James Garvey / November 13, 2017

The great philosopher offered a new way to think about how our social and political world...

The Bible story that unites politicians from Thatcher to Corbyn

Nick Spencer / November 7, 2017

Despite their sometimes strange interpretations, we should welcome the use of the...

Comments

SelfishWizard
August 8, 2017 at 02:12
JL Mackie was ahead of his time and his insights remain compelling today. All moral values are subjective. There is no objective morality. The word values implies a being that holds those values making the concept inherently subjective. Given the subjectivity of moral values the very meaning of morality is of a concept that attempts to make objective something that is inherently subjective. People can never convince each other in political discussions because they have different values. Subjective values are impervious to reason since they function as base assumptions. Recognizing this will save as all a lot of breath arguing with each other. We can simply recognize we have different values and go on from there.
Mark
August 17, 2017 at 14:12
"On the objective view, being good is a property a person or an action might really have. Slavery, itself, is evil. "Slavery is not a property a person has or an action. It is a multifaceted combination of events and experiences.It is trivial to say that morality cannot exist outside of subjective experience. Something can still be true while being a part of subjective experience. Trying to get to truth by removing subjectivity is pure scientism.