Latest Issue

The next move

Amid the uproar over Garry Kasparov's defeat by Deep Blue, we forgot one thing. It is not the machines which are brilliant, but the human beings who make them

By Oliver Morton   July 1997

It was a triumph, not of science, but of superstition. That is what we usually call it when people take a physical process devoid of intention, emotion, or agency and fill the dark shadows with loosely plausible imaginings. The spectacular defeat of Garry Kasparov brought on an effusion of these projections. An RS/6000 computer with a catchy name (Deep Blue), an effective programme and a solicitous entourage was loaded down with “brilliance,” “seeing the end,” and “playing like a god,” despite the fact that it no more deserves these human attributes than a storm cloud or a chainsaw. Indeed, it…

Register today to continue reading

You’ve hit your limit of three articles in the last 30 days. To get seven more, simply enter your email address below.

You’ll also receive our free e-book Prospect’s Top Thinkers 2020 and our newsletter with the best new writing on politics, economics, literature and the arts.

Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with newsletters, subscription offers and other relevant information.

Click here to learn more about these purposes and how we use your data. You will be able to opt-out of further contact on the next page and in all our communications.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to

More From Prospect