Egypt could look to Pakistanby Samira Shackle / July 18, 2013 / Leave a comment
Published in August 2013 issue of Prospect Magazine
On 30th June, after months of unrest, millions of Egyptians turned out to protest against the leadership of Mohamed Morsi, the country’s first democratically elected president in six decades. Three days later, on 3rd July, he had been deposed by the army, almost exactly one year after he took office. This bloodless military coup was met with jubilation in Tahrir Square, where two years earlier, crowds had cheered the ousting of military dictator Hosni Mubarak.
Events have moved so quickly that it is impossible to predict what will happen next. Scores are dead after clashes between the army and supporters of Morsi’s Muslim Brotherhood. Generals have established an interim government and promised to hold new elections—but can the military ever be trusted as the guardians of democracy?
The situation in Egypt presents a quandary for commentators and politicians in the west. Military takeovers are bad; democracy is good. But Islamist politics are bad; secularists are good. Where do you stand when democracy has produced the wrong kind of leader? The Brotherhood has won three consecutive elections since 2011. Yet one of the key grievances against Morsi is that he did not behave democratically, granting himself extra powers, awarding jobs to his cronies and ignoring the voices of secularists and liberals as he pushed through his own party’s Islamist agenda.
While the western governments struggle to come up with a coherent response to Egypt that allows them to stand on the side of democracy without supporting Islamism, other countries have had a simpler response. In Pakistan—no stranger to military takeovers—the news was met with cynicism. “Been there, done that & got the T-shirt,” tweeted Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, grandson of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto (ousted and executed by General Zia al-Haq in 1977), as the news of Morsi’s fall came.