Latest Issue

Poverty and wickedness

Charles Murray's assertions about the underlcass in Britain do not stand up to scrutiny, says AH Halsey. Social policy should instead focus on how to make citizen's income feasible

By AH Halsey   April 1997

It is a fundament of liberalism, shared by ethical socialists and “wet” conservatives that, when faced with outrageous opinion, one seeks to expand and not to suppress free speech. No doubt there are debatable limits to what liberals will tolerate-for example, the advocacy of pornography or racism-but Charles Murray’s writing is located within those limits. It requires serious, if condemnatory review, rather than censorship. Murray aspires to be a Billy Graham of the social sciences; so does David Green who wants to make discussion of the “underclass” available for teaching to undergraduates via a new booklet published by the Institute…

Register today to continue reading

You’ve hit your limit of three articles in the last 30 days. To get seven more, simply enter your email address below.

You’ll also receive our free e-book Prospect’s Top Thinkers 2020 and our newsletter with the best new writing on politics, economics, literature and the arts.

Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with newsletters, subscription offers and other relevant information.

Click here to learn more about these purposes and how we use your data. You will be able to opt-out of further contact on the next page and in all our communications.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to

More From Prospect