Magazine
Latest Issue

In his nature

John Maddox is right to rubbish the end of science thesis-but should have followed his own advice about fact-checking

By John Gribbin   35

More than 25 years ago, I learned my trade as a science writer on Nature magazine, when John Maddox reigned as editor. I quickly learned that his advice was invaluable; by following it, I soon made progress in my chosen profession. But I also discovered that the boss was bad at following his own advice. Maddox was (and is) such a fluent writer, with such a broad grasp of science, that he came to believe that he could write anything about anything, without always checking the facts. He usually wrote tight up against a deadline, so that the first draft…

Register today to continue reading

You’ve hit your limit of three articles in the last 30 days. To get seven more, simply enter your email address below.

You’ll also receive our free e-book Prospect’s Top Thinkers 2020 and our newsletter with the best new writing on politics, economics, literature and the arts.

Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with newsletters, subscription offers and other relevant information.

Click here to learn more about these purposes and how we use your data. You will be able to opt-out of further contact on the next page and in all our communications.

We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to letters@prospect-magazine.co.uk

More From Prospect