The true character of our main political parties is being revealed by Brexitby Jay Elwes / April 20, 2018 / Leave a comment
One of the more startling sights of the Brexit debate on trade has been the transformation of Conservative politicians into convinced, enthusiastic market interventionists. The party of big government is back, only this time, it sports a blue rosette.
It’s a remarkable volte face by the party that for so long has developed economic policy in the long shadows of Hayek and Friedman, and has excoriated the left’s urge to meddle in markets. But now the British right has seeded Brexit, perhaps the most far-reaching example of government intervention in modern British peace-time history.
And when the Conservative Trade Envoy, Mark Prisk, talks about how the government must concentrate on “getting more companies to become exporters,” as Britain leaves the EU, we can see that transformation writ large. It is a statement of pure interventionist intent.
Prisk also warns that, after Brexit, “some UK sectors will fare better than others,” in striking deals with the EU and that “we won’t get everything we seek.” How remarkable that a Conservative should need to point out the government’s limited ability to influence the structures of international markets.
And it is the staunchest right-wing members of the Conservative government, including Liam Fox, the Secretary of State for Trade, who have become the most seized by the possibility of creating an all new business environment. Fox showed this when he envisioned a new, “post-geographical” era of trade—a time when Britain would no longer need to prioritise trade deals with countries just because they happen to be nearest to us.