• Home
  • About us
  • Contact Us
  • Date/Time
  • Login
  • Subscribe

logo

  • Home
  • Politics
  • Economics & Finance
  • World
  • Arts & Books
  • Life
  • Science
  • Philosophy
  • Subscribe
  • Events
Home
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • Politics
  • Economics & Finance
  • World
  • Arts & Books
  • Life
  • Science
  • Philosophy
  • Subscribe
  • Events
  • Home
  • Economics & Finance

NAFTA negotiations hold important lessons for UK

If Brexit Britain wants a deal with Trump, our negotiators should study how the president operates

by David Henig / September 7, 2018 / Leave a comment
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Email

Donald Trump before an announcement on NAFTA made from the Oval Office. Photo: Sipa USA/SIPA USA/PA Images

Confounding a significant number of predictions it looks like President Trump may deliver on his pledge to renegotiate NAFTA, the North American Free Trade Agreement. There are still hurdles to overcome, but Mexico has signed up in principle, and talks have now resumed with Canada, the third party to NAFTA. The president has started the process of notifying Congress, which has the ultimate say. He has until the end of September to submit the text to them for approval.

A successful conclusion is by no means a certainty. Canada could refuse a new agreement, and Congress could decide not to effectively replace a three-country agreement with one just involving the United States and Mexico. There may be controversies lurking within the text once this is released. Even so, we can still pick up some valuable clues about President Trump’s negotiating approach from NAFTA and interactions with EU President Juncker just before summer. These can help us to understand what could happen after Brexit in a UK-US negotiation.

First and most obvious, for President Trump it is still all about making the deal. US tariffs already imposed on steel and aluminium, those threatened on automotives, and those that could hit Mexico if the NAFTA agreement was simply terminated, forced countries to the negotiating table. Once at the table deals are found, even if they are messy. In the case of the agreement just reached with Mexico changes to the rules governing automotive exports were the centrepiece. Elsewhere, the EU promised more imports of US soybeans affected by retaliatory tariffs imposed by China.

This is of course an unorthodox way of making trade deals. One trade analyst recently bluntly stated that “no country in their right minds wants to negotiate with the US,” citing in particular the determination of Japan to avoid bilateral trade talks with Trump even when offered. For nothing has changed the president’s view that trade is a zero sum game where for the US to win the other country has to lose. The UK could be unique in actively approaching the US for a deal at the moment.

However there is a small possibility that this could work in the UK’s favour. The same analyst commented that “the special relationship will mean nothing,” but equally it is possible that the president will be prepared to change some of the traditional elements of US trade agreements in order to get a deal. Perhaps if the UK says that to get a deal there has to be no chlorinated chicken and hormone treated beef he will agree. Maybe we could have a services only deal. Or the US could agree to more constructive engagement with the WTO in return for a deal.

Then again, the early indications from the Mexico agreement seem to suggest that the president may be unorthodox, but underlying interests remain constant, including on agriculture. According to the fact sheet published by the US administration the two countries agreed on “Enhanced Rules for Science-Based Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures,” for which read Mexico accepting the full range of US food rules that are so controversial in Europe. They also agreed “New Disciplines on Geographic Indications and Common Names for Cheeses.” This is pushback against EU policies which have sought to insist that products (such as Parmesan cheese) have to come from particular regions of the EU when sold in foreign markets.

Equally there is yet to be evidence that concluding a deal with President Trump will exempt you from whatever he does or tweets next. Mexico may have agreed to rules which protect the US car industry against competition, but could still be hit by extra tariffs if the president decides this on grounds of national security. Confrontation and dominance seem to be the Trump aim in international trade talks, following on presumably from the way he ran his businesses for many years.

The size of trading partners clearly matters. There is some evidence that the major trade powers such as the EU, China and Japan are going to resist, partly by retaliating against new tariffs, and partly through talks and mini-deals that keep delaying the president from doing further damage. The EU’s pre-summer deal with the US that included the soybeans, plus a commitment to look at reducing industrial tariffs, already looks likely to unravel over whether agricultural barriers should be included. Smaller countries such as Mexico and South Korea have however agreed more substantive deals.

The question this leaves is whether first Canada and then the UK can get a good deal from the US. Canada is the next to watch, with agreement required by the end of the month under US rules. After March focus could turn to the UK.

Talk to UK business and they don’t really want a trade deal with the US. Why risk our current, healthy trading relationship with the States when we can see no great gains, and potentially significant controversy? The answer is that a US deal has always been a political prize for a UK outside the EU, and while a negotiation with this president is a high risk gamble, a reasonable outcome is not completely impossible.

It is, however, unlikely.

Go to comments

Related articles

Why trade deficits are not a bad thing

David Henig / January 4, 2019
In Trump’s US and closer to home, decision-makers don’t understand how the global...
The new north American trade deal contains a lesson for Brexit Britain
George Magnus / October 8, 2018
You can do a deal with China or the US but not both
Share with friends
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Email

Comments

No comments yet

Prospect's free newsletter

The big ideas that are shaping our world—straight to your inbox. PLUS a free e-book and 7 articles of your choosing on the Prospect website.

Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with our newsletter, subscription offers and other relevant information. Click here to learn more about these purposes and how we use your data. You will be able to opt-out of further contact on the next page and in all our communications.

This Month's Magazine

Perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus.

Prospect is the leading magazine of ideas. Each month it is packed with the finest writing on politics, culture, economics and ideas. Subscribe today and join the debate.

Subscribe

Most Popular

  • Read
  • Commented

The invigorating strangeness of Friedrich Nietzsche

The naïve optimism of Liam Fox

Why I bet £1000 that a no-deal Brexit will trigger recession

Labour's Remainers could be a ticking time bomb for the party

The Duel: Has modern architecture ruined Britain?

Ruling out no deal is the wrong sort of red line

6 Comments

The Conservative Party has a problem—it’s no longer conservative

5 Comments

The overlooked dynamic at the heart of the Brexit “culture war”

2 Comments

Arlene Foster’s DUP still holds the balance of power in Westminster—so what’s their next move?

2 Comments

The impact of Brexit on services has not received nearly enough attention

2 Comments

About this author

David Henig
David Henig was Assistant Director at the Department for International Trade. He is now Uk Director at the European Centre For International Political Economy
  • Follow on:
  • Twitter
More by this author

More by David Henig

Why the Trans-Pacific trade pact debate may end up being a re-run of Leave/Remain
September 28, 2018
A Brexit probability index—tracking what will happen next
August 29, 2018
The limits of free trade
July 31, 2018

Next Prospect events

  • Details

    Prospect Book Club—Diarmaid MacCulloch

    London, 2019-05-20

  • Details

    Prospect Book Club—Sue Prideaux

    2019-04-15

  • Details

    Prospect Book Club—Andrew Roberts

    2019-03-14

See more events

Sponsored features

  • Reforming the pension system to work for the many

  • Putting savers in the driving seat: getting the pensions dashboard right

  • To fix the housing crisis we need fresh thinking

  • Tata Steel UK: Driving innovation for the future of mobility

  • The road to zero

PrimeTime

The magazine is owned and supported by the Resolution Group, as part of its not-for-profit, public interest activities.

Follow us
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • RSS

Editorial

Editor: Tom Clark
Deputy Editor: Steve Bloomfield
Managing Editor (Arts & Books): Sameer Rahim
Head of Digital: Stephanie Boland
Deputy Digital Editor (Political Correspondent): Alex Dean
Creative Director: Mike Turner
Production Editor & Designer: Chris Tilbury
US Writer-at-Large: Sam Tanenhaus

Commercial

Commercial Director: Alex Stevenson
Head of Marketing: Paul Mortimer
Marketing and Circulations Executive: James Hawkins
Programme Coordinator: Oliver James Ward
Head of Advertising Sales: Adam Kinlan 020 3372 2934
Senior Account Manager: Dominic Slonecki 0203 372 2972

  • Home
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Acceptable Use Policy
© Prospect Publishing Limited
×
Login
Login with your subscriber account:
You need a valid subscription to login.
I am
Remember Me


Forgotten password?

Or enter with social networking:
Login to post comments using social media accounts.
  • With Twitter
  • Connect
  • With Google +
×
Register Now

Register today and access any 7 articles on the Prospect’s website for FREE in the next 30 days..
PLUS find out about the big ideas that will shape our world—with Prospect’s FREE newsletter sent to your inbox. We'll even send you our e-book—Writing with punch—with some of the finest writing from the Prospect archive, at no extra cost!

Not Now, Thanks

Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with our newsletter, subscription offers and other relevant information.

Click to learn more about these interests and how we use your data. You will be able to object to this processing on the next page and in all our communications.

×
You’ve got full access!

It looks like you are a Prospect subscriber.

Prospect subscribers have full access to all the great content on our website, including our entire archive.

If you do not know your login details, simply close this pop-up and click 'Login' on the black bar at the top of the screen, then click 'Forgotten password?', enter your email address and press 'Submit'. Your password will then be emailed to you.

Thank you for your support of Prospect and we hope that you enjoy everything the site has to offer.

This site uses cookies to improve the user experience. By using this site, you agree that we can set and use these cookies. For more details on the cookies we use and how to manage them, see our Privacy and Cookie Policy.