Several of the appointments are to briefs that have a high degree of churn. That's bad news for the Prime Minister—and for the countryby Alex Dean / January 9, 2018 / Leave a comment
Theresa May had hoped to assert some strength yesterday. In the end, the reshuffle had the opposite effect: it exposed her weakness. The press was briefed to expect big changes at Health and Business. Today, Jeremy Hunt and Greg Clark remain in their posts, apparently after refusing to budge. Andrea Leadsom, also thought to be on the way out, remains in place as Leader of the Commons.
The truth is that whatever her success in Europe last month, May is too weak to carry out the changes she had envisioned. Indeed, the biggest cabinet change—the departure of Education Secretary Justine Greening—was the consequence of a dramatic resignation. Not the political reboot the PM had wanted.
Still, May did manage to shuffle a few ministers around. David Gauke is the new Justice Secretary, while Esther McVey replaces the disgraced Damian Green at the Department for Work and Pensions. Matthew Hancock is now at the Department for Culture, Media and Sport. David Lidington is the new Whitehall fixer, moved to Cabinet Office Minister, while Damian Hinds has gone to Education.
The problem is that these changes have something in common. They are all changes in departments which since 2010 have seen more than their fair share of upheaval. The roles May has changed have experienced disproportionate “churn” since the Conservatives first came to power. And that’s a worry.