Recent comments from senior "Leavers" reveal "the xenophobia that is common in Ukip"by Oliver Kamm / June 2, 2016 / Leave a comment
There are roughly five or six thousand natural languages spoken in the world today. The estimate is imprecise because it depends whether you count some tongues as languages or dialects. Of all those thousands, the language least threatened by extinction is the one you’re reading.
The economic case argued by Brexit campaigners makes little enough sense on its own. When you throw in the notion that Britain outside the EU could and should impose language requirements on immigrants, it enters the realm of the immoderately preposterous.
This week, “Leave” campaigners Michael Gove, Boris Johnson, Priti Patel and Gisela Stuart argued in a joint statement: “For relevant jobs, we will be able to ensure that all those who come have the ability to speak good English.”
Who gets to decide what’s a relevant job and what’s good English? The answer is not the employer but the state. It’s one of the paradoxes of the referendum campaign that the visionaries of Little England turn out to be unabashed advocates of Big Government. Britain does not have a problem with a large labour force that can’t speak English well enough. And if it did, insisting on language qualifications for migrants wouldn’t be a way of fixing it.
The latest census figures show that 92 per cent of people in this country speak English (or English or Welsh, in Wales) as their main language. Of the remainder, eight out of ten report speaking English well or very well. The number of people who can’t speak English at all amounts to 138,000—comfortably less than half a per cent of the population.