We need to overcome the barriers keeping people out of workby Iain Duncan Smith / November 16, 2011 / Leave a comment
Published in December 2011 issue of Prospect Magazine
What does it mean to be poor? And, perhaps more importantly, how can someone be pulled out of poverty? For years the government has assessed poverty levels using a relative income measure, which means a household is counted as poor if it has 60 per cent of the median income.
This measure certainly has value, but it comes with a risk. If income is the problem, then throwing money at the problem can too often be seen as the only solution, with few questions asked about how that money is spent.
While some progress has been made on child poverty in recent years, I’m concerned that too much of that money was spent on out-of-work benefits, pushing people just above the poverty line without changing their lives. We see this borne out in the figures: from 1998 to 2010 the likelihood of being in relative poverty declined 1.5 times faster for children living in workless families than for children living in families where somebody worked.
So while the government remains committed to the poverty targets, we are not neutral about how they are met. For those who are able to work, employment should be the best route out of poverty. For those who don’t have a job, but could work, we want to provide targeted interventions, using local expertise, to overcome the barriers keeping them out of the labour market.
Consider a real-life case. Barry was a drug addict, brought up by addicted parents and abused by his stepfather. Living in care homes and spending time with boys much older than him, he was using heroin by the age of 15. Turning to crime to fund his habit, Barry spent the next 17 years in and out of prison.