Latest Issue

Diana’s jury

Last week's surprising high court ruling on the Diana inquest could have implications that extend way beyond one case

By Ian Caplin   March 2007

Last week the high court ordered that the inquest into the deaths of Diana, Princess of Wales and Dodi Al-Fayed should be held with a jury, reversing the ruling of Baroness Elizabeth Butler-Sloss, sitting as the deputy coroner. Should we care? Actually, yes. Few noticed the proposition advanced by their lordships: that, in the eyes of English law, the paparazzi on wheels are a threat to public health and safety.

It had been thought that the decision of whether to proceed with a jury should be at the discretion of Butler-Sloss. But it emerged that the baroness’s legal analysis was…

Register today to continue reading

You’ve hit your limit of three articles in the last 30 days. To get seven more, simply enter your email address below.

You’ll also receive our free e-book Prospect’s Top Thinkers 2020 and our newsletter with the best new writing on politics, economics, literature and the arts.

Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with newsletters, subscription offers and other relevant information.

Click here to learn more about these purposes and how we use your data. You will be able to opt-out of further contact on the next page and in all our communications.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to

More From Prospect