Is romanticism the natural condition of art? Wassily Kandinsky thought so. “It is no part of my programme,” he wrote, “to paint with tears, and I really don’t care for sweets, but romanticism goes far, far beyond tears. The meaning, the content of art is romanticism, and it is our fault if we mistake a temporal phenomenon for the whole notion.”
Go to Tate Modern, and romanticism is the elephant in the room that everybody knows is there but no one wants to acknowledge. For almost half a year, its cavernous turbine hall was transformed into a setting sun seen…
Register today to continue reading
You’ve hit your limit of three articles in the last 30 days. To get seven more, simply enter your email address below.
You’ll also receive our free e-book Prospect’s Top Thinkers 2020 and our newsletter with the best new writing on politics, economics, literature and the arts.
Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with newsletters, subscription offers and other relevant information.
Click here to learn more about these purposes and how we use your data. You will be able to opt-out of further contact on the next page and in all our communications.
Already a subscriber? Log in here