Read philosophy for philosophy's sakeby Julian Baggini / April 20, 2002 / Leave a comment
Published in April 2002 issue of Prospect Magazine
Why should anyone bother to read philosophy? Isn’t it a nit-picking discipline with no real benefits? I used to have a stock riposte to such views, which I thought presented a pretty good defence.
First, philosophy provides an excellent training in clear thinking. The abilities to reason, to distinguish sense from nonsense and to construct strong arguments can serve one well in many areas of life. There also seems to be something valuable about critically scrutinising the important questions that confront us-as in the famous phrase, “the unexamined life is not worth living.”
This engagement with deep issues could even contribute to increased happiness. Thinking philosophically requires one to stand back from things and this puts matters which otherwise might seem urgent and substantial into perspective. As Bertrand Russell put it in the last, rousing chapter of his The Problems of Philosophy, a life without this perspective is “feverish and confined,” by comparison with which the philosophic life is “calm and free.”
On this account, philosophy can make you think better, feel better and is essential to an honest confrontation with the big issues of life. What better answer to the sceptics who think it is hot air?
But I now think this case is much weaker than I once thought. While none of the supposed advantages philosophy brings are illusory, neither are they as indispensable as they once seemed.