• Home
  • About us
  • Contact Us
  • Date/Time
  • Login
  • Subscribe

logo

  • Home
  • Politics
  • Economics & Finance
  • World
  • Arts & Books
  • Life
  • Science
  • Philosophy
  • Subscribe
  • Events
Home
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • Politics
  • Economics & Finance
  • World
  • Arts & Books
  • Life
  • Science
  • Philosophy
  • Subscribe
  • Events
  • Home
  • Arts & Books

The BBC’s “Inside the War Room” should never have been made

It is not "just a television programme"

by Annabelle Chapman / February 3, 2016 / Leave a comment
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Email
A solder in a dramatised scene from World War Three: Inside the War Room © BBC, Gabriel Range

A solder in a dramatised scene from World War Three: Inside the War Room ©BBC, Gabriel Range

Read more: after Ukraine, are the Baltics in Putin’s sights? 

With the angry crowd wielding Russian flags, it looks just like a scene from Ukraine’s eastern Donbass region. Men in balaclavas storm a local government building and remove the flags from its façade. Except this time, they are the Latvian and EU flags, and the setting is not Ukraine but Latvia’s eastern region of Latgale, near the Russian Border. This is the opening of World War Three: Inside the War Room, which was broadcast on BBC Two tonight. In it, ten political, diplomatic and military figures war-game an imagined scenario in which Russia becomes militarily involved with Latvia and Estonia.

The one-hour programme jumps between fake documentary scenes set in Latvia, and scenes set in the “war room,” where the ten figures debate how to respond to Russia’s hypothetical moves and, ultimately, whether to engage in nuclear warfare. This makes for a charged 59 minutes of midweek television yet, given the current tensions along NATO’s eastern edge, the BBC’s decision to broadcast it is surprising.

The…

YOU’VE HIT THE LIMIT

You have now reached your limit of 3 free articles in the last 30 days.
But don’t worry! You can get another 7 articles absolutely free, simply by entering your email address in the box below.

When you register we’ll also send you a free e-book—Writing with punch—which includes some of the finest writing from our archive of 22 years. And we’ll also send you a weekly newsletter with the best new ideas in politics and philosophy of culture, which you can of course unsubscribe from at any time







Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with our newsletter, subscription offers and other relevant information.

Click to learn more about these interests and how we use your data. You will be able to object to this processing on the next page and in all our communications.

12317284455c6fd566337335.16568263

Go to comments

Related articles

The master programmers of Eastern Europe
Tom Ball / January 21, 2019
The Slavic countries are producing exceptionally skilled hackers—and sometimes that’s...
No longer a failure: Gary Shteyngart © Brigitte Lacombe
Gary Shteyngart: "Why go to Russia? I'm living in my own Russia"
Sameer Rahim / October 8, 2018
The novelist on why if he wants to write about a plutocratic kleptocracy, he doesn't need...
Share with friends
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Email

Comments

  1. Simon
    February 4, 2016 at 10:56
    I'm not sure that the programme was intended purely as entertainment and it was examining, in a wider sense, the Nato commitment to article 5, when the chips are down. It was also a reflection on whether, at the end of the day, there is any point in having nuclear weapons as a deterrent when using them in a retaliatory sense is futile. The renewal of trident is of course a hot topic of discussion at the moment. I think that yes, these topics are controversial (as were films like threads and the day after) at the time but it was, I felt, dealt with in a serious way.
  2. Patriot
    February 4, 2016 at 12:13
    It is virtual and not real. I am from Latgale and many Latgalians are very peaceful and joyful people and we are not inviting Russia. There will be great fights on the border without any discussions. This time we will not surrender, we will fight till the end.
  3. Kiron Reid
    February 4, 2016 at 20:33
    I thought it was a good idea and a good programme, based on what has happended in Ukraine and what Putin's Russian state is doing there now still. The footage seemed realistic (except the assumption that a rescue of captured British personnel against Russian backed militias would be smooth). But I did think it might upset people in Latvia and Estonia, and wondered how long it would take before Putin's media and his army of online trolls would start citing it as if the discussions and programme were British policy. Annabelle Champan has shown these have already started.
  4. Tom
    February 4, 2016 at 22:56
    I enjoyed this documentary because it was thought provoking as well as dramatic. Surely that is the BBC's brief? Personally I couldn't care less if it offends the Russians, (China is doing exactly the same thing on its borders), or if its too close to the bone. Is it better that people consider such matters out of sight out of mind? Should celebrity baking become the zenith of my programming expectation now? Its 77 years since we went to war with Nazi Germany because they invaded a sovereign nation. I reckon Churchill might turn in his grave on beholding the general apathy of the British public of today.
  5. Lee Q
    February 5, 2016 at 08:18
    The Scenario played out almost like it came from the eighties cold war period, the american stance basically pushing along the agenda forcing the game progression regardless of the war rooms choices. Ultimately the goal came to the final round which boils down to do we fire trident in response to a launch, this part was genuinely interesting as the majority could not bring themselves to fire. It kinda proves the pointlessness of nukes but the truth is probably more chilling as technically trident is a second strike device designed to cause as much harm as possible and more likely would NOT target military targets or already empty silos. At this point the war room becomes little more than some curious TV and shouldn't be taken too seriously.
  6. Stephan A.
    February 6, 2016 at 10:08
    I agree wholeheartedly. The more we talk about war the more likely it becomes. The BBC is playing into the hands of those in the government who would make it simply the mouthpiece of the state. One could not think of a better way of promoting the Government's 'Fear Russia' agenda. This 'mockumentary' lacks balance, spreads fear, and ignores the many positive aspects of Europe's relationships with its eastern neighbours. There is a rich cultural understanding and exchange whose effect on international relationships is totally ignored. The ignorant and biased view which seems to inform this programme severely damages the BBC's reputation.
  7. Bob Quinn
    February 6, 2016 at 16:38
    why can't I read the mag. online?
  8. Bob Quinn
    February 6, 2016 at 16:40
    I still can't read the full online version
  9. Bob
    February 7, 2016 at 03:05
    'The BBC programme is not a documentary, but could be assumed to be so' Except, presumably viewers will realise these events haven't actually taken place.
  10. Arthur B.
    February 16, 2016 at 14:18
    Well … I watched it, and was not completely convinced. The participants all seemed to perform to type, with the military ones all square-jawed determination. But then I'm not convinced by any of our "defence" postures either, a lot of which have little to do with actual defence. The only thing that I'm convinced of is that any nuclear conflict will end up very badly for everyone, whether we start it or "they" start it, or whether we are "right' or otherwise.
  11. digiwongadude
    February 19, 2016 at 16:00
    This programme is a follow-up to BBC War Book (2014), no doubt (imo). It is NO more "real" than that was. It simply takes the same ideas and puts it to real people, rather than a script using actors. Indeed, after watching "War Book" you kinda ask yourself what real people (in positions of real power) would do. This was the BBC's attempt at that - and a very good one to boot. If you want to concern yourself with Russian TV perceiving the UK as weak, remember it's not real and go watch War Book (I won't spoil it). In reflection on both comes one question from me. These weapons exist as a deterrent. If we are not prepared to use them, what use are they as a deterrent and thus why do we have them at all? Both programmes bring this question to the forefront very well.

Prospect's free newsletter

The big ideas that are shaping our world—straight to your inbox. PLUS a free e-book and 7 articles of your choosing on the Prospect website.

Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with our newsletter, subscription offers and other relevant information. Click here to learn more about these purposes and how we use your data. You will be able to opt-out of further contact on the next page and in all our communications.

This Month's Magazine

Perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus.

Prospect is the leading magazine of ideas. Each month it is packed with the finest writing on politics, culture, economics and ideas. Subscribe today and join the debate.

Subscribe

Most Popular

  • Read
  • Commented

This proposal for breaking the Brexit deadlock deserves serious consideration

Did the SDP really split the left in 1983?

The Duel: Has modern architecture ruined Britain?

Nonsense economics: the rise of modern monetary theory

The invigorating strangeness of Friedrich Nietzsche

The Conservative Party has a problem—it’s no longer conservative

5 Comments

The impact of Brexit on services has not received nearly enough attention

2 Comments

Even if Britain stays in Europe, we need a new constitutional settlement

2 Comments

If May's deal is in flames, Labour should not seek to put out the fire

2 Comments

The naïve optimism of Liam Fox

2 Comments

About this author

Annabelle Chapman
  • Follow Annabelle on:
  • Twitter
More by this author

More by Annabelle Chapman

What a simple grey poster can tell us about Polish politics
September 12, 2017
Books in brief: On Tyranny by Timothy Snyder
April 11, 2017
Books in brief: The Habsburg Empire
August 18, 2016

Next Prospect events

  • Details

    Prospect Book Club—Diarmaid MacCulloch

    London, 2019-05-20

  • Details

    Prospect Book Club—Sue Prideaux

    2019-04-15

  • Details

    Prospect Book Club—Andrew Roberts

    2019-03-14

See more events

Sponsored features

  • The future of transport: taking Britain into the fast lane

  • Reforming the pension system to work for the many

  • Putting savers in the driving seat: getting the pensions dashboard right

  • To fix the housing crisis we need fresh thinking

  • Tata Steel UK: Driving innovation for the future of mobility

PrimeTime

The magazine is owned and supported by the Resolution Group, as part of its not-for-profit, public interest activities.

Follow us
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • RSS

Editorial

Editor: Tom Clark
Deputy Editor: Steve Bloomfield
Managing Editor (Arts & Books): Sameer Rahim
Head of Digital: Stephanie Boland
Deputy Digital Editor (Political Correspondent): Alex Dean
Creative Director: Mike Turner
Production Editor & Designer: Chris Tilbury
US Writer-at-Large: Sam Tanenhaus

Commercial

Commercial Director: Alex Stevenson
Head of Marketing: Paul Mortimer
Marketing and Circulations Executive: James Hawkins
Programme Coordinator: Oliver James Ward
Head of Advertising Sales: Adam Kinlan 020 3372 2934
Senior Account Manager: Dominic Slonecki 0203 372 2972

  • Home
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Acceptable Use Policy
© Prospect Publishing Limited
×
Login
Login with your subscriber account:
You need a valid subscription to login.
I am
Remember Me


Forgotten password?

Or enter with social networking:
Login to post comments using social media accounts.
  • With Twitter
  • Connect
  • With Google +
×
Register Now

Register today and access any 7 articles on the Prospect’s website for FREE in the next 30 days..
PLUS find out about the big ideas that will shape our world—with Prospect’s FREE newsletter sent to your inbox. We'll even send you our e-book—Writing with punch—with some of the finest writing from the Prospect archive, at no extra cost!

Not Now, Thanks

Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with our newsletter, subscription offers and other relevant information.

Click to learn more about these interests and how we use your data. You will be able to object to this processing on the next page and in all our communications.

×
You’ve got full access!

It looks like you are a Prospect subscriber.

Prospect subscribers have full access to all the great content on our website, including our entire archive.

If you do not know your login details, simply close this pop-up and click 'Login' on the black bar at the top of the screen, then click 'Forgotten password?', enter your email address and press 'Submit'. Your password will then be emailed to you.

Thank you for your support of Prospect and we hope that you enjoy everything the site has to offer.

This site uses cookies to improve the user experience. By using this site, you agree that we can set and use these cookies. For more details on the cookies we use and how to manage them, see our Privacy and Cookie Policy.