Latest Issue

Undue modesty

We must not overhype brain science. But the real risk is that we underestimate it

By Alexander Linklater   March 2010

Matter into Imagination 3 by Susan Aldworth, perspex plate on collagraph plate

Two basic dangers face the non-specialist when applying the insights of neuroscience. The first is to imagine that an empirical scientific practice, concerned with neurotransmitters and brain anatomy, will one day provide an explanation for most human experiences. It’s not just excitable dilettantes in the humanities and media who succumb to this fallacy, but also some excitable neuroscientists—who glimpse wider cultural and social potential in their work.

Perhaps the most famous example of this occurred when behavioural neurologist VS Ramachandran described “mirror” neurons—which fire up in monkeys both…

Register today to continue reading

You’ve hit your limit of three articles in the last 30 days. To get seven more, simply enter your email address below.

You’ll also receive our free e-book Prospect’s Top Thinkers 2020 and our newsletter with the best new writing on politics, economics, literature and the arts.

Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with newsletters, subscription offers and other relevant information.

Click here to learn more about these purposes and how we use your data. You will be able to opt-out of further contact on the next page and in all our communications.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to

More From Prospect