Latest Issue

National derision

The Goldsmith review was widely mocked, but a modern idea of citizenship is no laughing matter

By David Goodhart   April 2008

The hoots of derision that greeted Lord Goldsmith’s citizenship review in early March revealed a continuing reluctance on the part of much of the British political class to think straight about national citizenship. Most of the media coverage got stuck on a single footnote in the review—the idea of a school-leaver oath of allegiance to the Queen (or to British society)—thereby providing an opportunity for leading figures on both left and right to disdain the modest reforms to the language and institutions of citizenship that this government is proposing.

Opposition from the left was to be expected. Since the 1960s,…

Register today to continue reading

You’ve hit your limit of three articles in the last 30 days. To get seven more, simply enter your email address below.

You’ll also receive our free e-book Prospect’s Top Thinkers 2020 and our newsletter with the best new writing on politics, economics, literature and the arts.

Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with newsletters, subscription offers and other relevant information.

Click here to learn more about these purposes and how we use your data. You will be able to opt-out of further contact on the next page and in all our communications.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to

More From Prospect