Election 2017 is the most important for a generation—or so we are told. Actually, poor Britons are set for a brutal squeeze whoever triumphs next monthby Tom Clark / May 26, 2017 / Leave a comment
Election 2017 is a choice between Theresa May’s buttoned-up, Brexit Conservatism and Jeremy Corbyn’s unshaven socialism. So the obvious thing to say about it is, of course, that it represents one almighty fork in the road. And when you look behind the leaders to the nuts and bolts of the policy programmes that they are putting forward, there is a great deal of truth in that.
Instead of the £10bn or £12bn differences in tax and spend plans, which has often been all there is to choose between the parties in the other elections that I can recall, Corbyn’s Labour is putting forward tax rises and spending pledges to match of more like £49bn, so roughly four times as much. Should Corbyn win, there would be an immediate and sharp rise in corporation tax, a reversal to planned steep cuts in school spending, and an entirely different approach to the economy, incorporating a significant public investment programme and even renationalisation of some of the utilities. Should the Tories win, by contrast, a hard Brexit and much harder immigration caps could very soon have grave implications for the economy and the Exchequer.
And yet. Listening to the Institute for Fiscal Studies crunch the two manifestos this morning, what struck me more than the undoubted differences between the rival visions for Britain was the shared problems that the next government will face whoever wins. This was not only because the Institute was equally sniffy about the two documents—although it certainly was that, mocking Labour’s failure to grapple with how much tax dodging its r…