On Tuesday, Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson said that Russia should be investigated for war crimes for its bombardment of Aleppo, Syria’s second city. Russia is “guilty of making the war far more protracted and far more hideous, and yes, when it comes up, the bombing of civilian targets, we should be looking … to see if the targeting is done in the knowledge they are wholly innocent civilian targets.”
He called for protests outside the Russian embassy in London, and said “the mills of justice grind slowly, but they grind small,” as he predicted those responsible would one day face the International Criminal Court. Russia insists that it does not target civilians with its strikes; only terrorists.
US Secretary of State John Kerry last week said attacks by Russia and the Syrian government on hospitals were “beyond the accidental,” and that Aleppo could be completely wiped out by December. French President Francois Hollande has argued that those who commit war crimes will “have to face up to their responsibility.” Putin has since cancelled his planned visit to France.
So, should Russia be hauled before the ICC? Experts including Martin Fletcher, former Foreign Editor of the Times, and Robert Fry, former Deputy Commanding General of coalition forces in Iraq, answer.
Martin Fletcher is a former Foreign Editor of the Times
Russia has undoubtedly committed war crimes in Syria. I would love to see Putin hauled before the International Criminal Court. But to demand that course of action now is…