Latest Issue

Brexit and the final defeat of honesty

Even the government’s sporadic truth-telling is used to advance further falsehood

By Jonathan Lis  

Imagine if they had conceded in 2016 that there would be trading friction. Photo: Dominic Lipinski/PA Wire/PA Images

Indulge me, if you will, in a little thought experiment. Imagine that, in the run-up to last October, Boris Johnson had admitted that no-deal would cause untold chaos or disruption, and that people had voted for neither, but that he thought it would be worth it. That during the general election, he had spelt out the necessity of checks on goods travelling between Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and carefully explained…

Register today to continue reading

You’ve hit your limit of three articles in the last 30 days. To get seven more, simply enter your email address below.

You’ll also receive our free e-book Prospect’s Top Thinkers 2020 and our newsletter with the best new writing on politics, economics, literature and the arts.

Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with newsletters, subscription offers and other relevant information.

Click here to learn more about these purposes and how we use your data. You will be able to opt-out of further contact on the next page and in all our communications.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to

More From Prospect