What explains the decline of violence?by Edward Luttwak / May 22, 2014 / Leave a comment
Published in June 2014 issue of Prospect Magazine
The Conquest of Siberia by Vasily Surikov, 1895: “Wars cannot bring peace without victory, and cannot be won by clever stratagems alone” © Fine Art Images/Superstock
Everyone knows that the purpose of war is to bring peace by ending deadly quarrels in one way or another. In his new book, Ian Morris explores the different ways in which this has been achieved across the millennia, drawing examples from the pre-prehistory of primate studies to the headlines of 2013, by way of archaeology (his profession) and plain historiography (his passion). Morris reprises the celebrated argument of the sociologist Norbert Elias that the “civilising process” is responsible for the decline in violence over recent centuries. My own belief is that nuclear weapons, and they alone, prevented a third world war during the Cold War years.
Morris, who is a professor of classics and archaeology at Stanford, starts by clearing away the delusion that peace could exist in the “state of nature”—that is, before the development of civil society or the political state. Before there were greedy military industries, bellicose professional soldiers or evil politicians to provoke periodic wars, there was instead the perpetual war of all against all. Many anthropologists have been reluctant to recognise the obvious—that tribespeople are warriors who like to keep in practice even when resources are not scarce.
That allows Morris to have fun debunking the peaceful-savage mythology popularised in the 20th century by Margaret…