The most interesting thing about last night’s presidential debate occurred after the debate itself ended. Victory, as adjudged by a variety of different focus groups and snap polls, was awarded pretty decisively to Barack Obama.
What makes this so interesting, I think, is that it isn’t true. Obama had some strong moments, certainly, and was never less than competent. But the same might be said for John McCain. As is usually the case with these presidential debates (a tradition, leaving aside the Kennedy-Nixon encounters in 1960, dating back only to…
Register today to continue reading
You’ve hit your limit of three articles in the last 30 days. To get seven more, simply enter your email address below.
You’ll also receive our free e-book Prospect’s Top Thinkers 2020 and our newsletter with the best new writing on politics, economics, literature and the arts.
Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with newsletters, subscription offers and other relevant information.
Click here to learn more about these purposes and how we use your data. You will be able to opt-out of further contact on the next page and in all our communications.
Already a subscriber? Log in here