Ken Isaacs, Trump's nominee, is fond of anti-Muslim Tweets and thinks Austria and Switzerland should build a wall to keep out migrants. But he'll almost certainly get the job—and that's where the problem liesby Steve Bloomfield / May 21, 2018 / Leave a comment
The International Organisation for Migration is, as the name suggests, a global body that promotes migration. In the age of Trump, the IOM is more important than ever. Which is why it’s more than a little problematic that the likely next head of the IOM, nominated for the role by Donald Trump, has a long history of sharing anti-Islamic and anti-migrant tweets.
Ken Isaacs has suggested that Austria and Switzerland build a wall across the Alps to keep out refugees, claimed that Islam is “not peaceful” and has also used Twitter to promote a host of conspiracy theories.
But it’s just a nomination, right? Surely those who make the appointment will go for someone who supports migrants, isn’t prejudiced towards many of them based on their religion, and who makes decisions based on actual facts rather than “alternative facts.”
This is where we hit a broader problem—one that affects how the world is governed. Very few of the major international jobs are awarded to the right candidate. Many of them are instead doled out to someone from the right country.
An American has always run the World Bank; a European has always been the head of the International Monetary Fund. One of the top UN jobs always has to go to a Brit—for the past decade or so, it’s been the office of humanitarian affairs regardless of whether the candidate has the requisite experience or not (Sir John Holmes, for instance, had just been the UK ambassador to France; hardly the most useful training for a job that involved negotiating humanitarian access in Darfur).