• Home
  • About us
  • Contact Us
  • Date/Time
  • Login
  • Subscribe

logo

  • Home
  • Politics
  • Economics & Finance
  • World
  • Arts & Books
  • Life
  • Science
  • Philosophy
  • Subscribe
  • Events
Home
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • Politics
  • Economics & Finance
  • World
  • Arts & Books
  • Life
  • Science
  • Philosophy
  • Subscribe
  • Events
  • Home
  • Politics

Forget the £10,000—it’s time to accept that millennials aren’t sabotaging themselves

It was the idea of a "citizen's inheritance" that made headlines. But there was a more important finding in the Resolution Foundation's report on intergenerational inequality—one that destroys the myth of millennial irresponsibility

by Sarah Manavis / May 9, 2018 / Leave a comment
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Email

It’s time to get rid of the avocado cliches once and for all.

Making a joke about millennials and avocados has moved beyond the point of being provocative into being simply boring. Used to mock the generation born between 1981-2000 for spending too much on meals out and having too little in their savings account, this tired joke has become only the most cliché way for baby boomers to blame millennials for their own financial ruin.

But on Tuesday, the Resolution Foundation turned that idea on its head. Publishing the findings of a two year study, the group proposed that every 25-year-old in Britain should be paid £10,000 to make up for an uncovered generational inequality suffered by millennials. Dubbed the “citizen’s inheritance,” this lump-sum would be a “small a restricted-use asset endowment” for young people to use for very specific purposes, including, but not limited to, “skills, entrepreneurship, housing and pension saving.”

Although the 229-page report delves into far more than just this idea, it’s this proposal that has, for obvious reasons, made the headlines. The £10K policy proposal has already conjured up strong reactions, from provocateurs and measured commentators alike. With the proposed funding for this policy coming from the money created by taxing pensioners on national insurance, some have suggested that a £10K sticking plaster would not solve intergenerational inequality, and was in fact bound to make the rich richer and the poor not much better off. Other commentators, meanwhile, have heralded the policy as a welcome response to millenials’ financial difficulties.

Millenials aren’t spending more

However, regardless of where you fall on this spectrum, debate about this £10K policy proposal misses the point. Because this report did something far greater than suggest a flashy, controversial policy: it put forward evidence to argue that millennials’ financial situation was not, in fact, self-inflicted ruin, but a tragedy created by the baby boomers who have so roundly criticised them.

Buried in the report—and in many of the media responses to it—was the finding that, 15 years ago, 25 to 34-year-olds spent just as much as 55 to 64-year-olds. Today, millennials are spending 15 per cent less. This, accompanied by lower wages, less opportunity to save, and a bleak future of continued wage stagnation, means that despite the unrelenting myths of expensive stone fruit and nice coffees, millennials are actually more conservative consumers than their baby boomer counterparts. Tropes like the Money Diary Girl and the lazy, irresponsible young person aren’t just unfair stereotypes—in fact, they are the direct opposite of the reality.

Stop talking about avocados

No doubt this is going to be a tough pill to swallow for the people who love to deploy the trope of the irresponsible millennial. The question of whether or not young people could be better off financially if they spent less money on avocados has permeated the public consciousness; regularly featuring in mainstream newspapers and even making its way onto Question Time.

Ultimately, this isn’t about whether or not to give millennials £10,000. It isn’t about the morality or practicality of implementing this attention-grabbing policy. Whether or not you agree with the solution, the problem uncovered in this study should be what is salient: that an entire generation is being smeared for something they didn’t, and don’t, do.

They aren’t being hired for jobs, they can’t afford a mortgage, and yet they’re being maligned in the national press—all because of a misconception that they are “irresponsible,” based on an older generation’s misinformed anecdotal evidence. Put aside the media storm around it, and this report contains more than just a snazzy headline. It reveals that calling millennials irresponsible, lazy, spoiled complainers isn’t an opinion. It’s a lie.

So finally, let’s admit that it isn’t millennials who have sabotaged themselves. And let’s admit that they’re doing all they can to remove themselves from the mess of another generation’s making.

Go to comments

Related articles

The Prospect Interview #113: The Labour leadership contest, explained
Prospect Team / January 13, 2020
Plus what Rebecca Long-Bailey, Keir Starmer and others are making of the party's historic...
The Lords must amend the new Brexit legislation to prevent a muddle in the courts
Raphael Hogarth / January 13, 2020
But they will need sharp political antennae
Share with friends
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Email

Comments

No comments yet

Prospect's free newsletter

The big ideas that are shaping our world— straight to your inbox. PLUS receive a free e-book and 7 articles of your choosing on the Prospect website.

Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with our newsletter, subscription offers and other relevant information. Click here to learn more about these purposes and how we use your data. You will be able to opt-out of further contact on the next page and in all our communications.

This Month's Magazine

Perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus.

The US’s poor performance in tackling Covid-19 versus China’s apparent success in locking it down has led some to believe that the liberal model can never be as effective as an authoritarian one. But there’s plenty in liberal democracy still worth fighting for, argues Steve Bloomfield.

Subscribe

Most Popular

  • Read
  • Commented

"Men are trash": the surprisingly philosophical story behind an internet punchline

White lies matter

The world’s top 50 thinkers 2019

No 10 is misreading the polls on lockdown

5 Comments

The government’s contempt for the rule of law

3 Comments

Would an earlier lockdown have halved the death toll?

3 Comments

Why working from home isn't as great as you think

3 Comments

Astronomers unknowingly dedicated moon craters to Nazis. Will the next historical reckoning be at cosmic level?

2 Comments

About this author

Sarah Manavis
Sarah Manavis is a writer. Her work has been featured in Vice, New Statesman and the Overtake
  • Follow Sarah on:
  • Twitter
More by this author

Next Prospect events

  • Details

    Nature v Business?

    2020-07-14

  • Details

    Listen: Where pensions freedoms should go next?

    2020-06-25

  • Details

    Prospect Book Club - Hadley Freeman

    2020-06-15

See more events

Sponsored features

  • The changing role of international finance centres in the modern world

  • Is a retired French hotelier a forgotten member of the royal family?

  • Protecting the high seas would mark a huge step in ocean conservation

  • Interview with historian Archie Brown: Rethinking the Cold War

  • How can we encourage nations to come together to protect the high seas?

PrimeTime

The magazine is owned and supported by the Resolution Group, as part of its not-for-profit, public interest activities.

Follow us
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • RSS

Editorial

Editor: Tom Clark
Managing Editor (Arts & Books): Sameer Rahim
Head of Digital: Chris Tilbury
Production Editor: David McAllister
Senior Editor: Alex Dean
Creative Director: Mike Turner
Digital Assistant: Rebecca Liu
US Writer-at-Large: Sam Tanenhaus

Commercial

Commercial Director: Alex Stevenson
Head of Marketing: Paul Mortimer
Marketing and Circulation Executive: Susan Acan
Head of Events: Victoria Jackson
Events Project Manager: Nadine Prospere
Head of Advertising Sales: Adam Kinlan 020 3372 2934
Senior Account Manager: Patrick Lappin
Head of Key Accounts Harriet Radcliffe
Head of Finance and Resources: David de Lange

  • Home
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Acceptable Use Policy
© Prospect Publishing Limited
×
Login
Login with your subscriber account:
You need a valid subscription to login.
I am
Remember Me


Forgotten password?

Or enter with social networking:
Login to post comments using social media accounts.
  • With Twitter
  • Connect
  • With Google +
×
Register Now

REGISTER NOW

Register today and access any 7 articles on the Prospect website FREE in the next 30 days.

PLUS you’ll find out about the big ideas that will shape our world with Prospect’s newsletter and receive our Top Thinkers e-book free.

Not Now, Thanks

Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with our newsletter, subscription offers and other relevant information.

Click to learn more about these interests and how we use your data. You will be able to object to this processing on the next page and in all our communications.

×
You’ve got full access!

It looks like you are a Prospect subscriber.

Prospect subscribers have full access to all the great content on our website, including our entire archive.

If you do not know your login details, simply close this pop-up and click 'Login' on the black bar at the top of the screen, then click 'Forgotten password?', enter your email address and press 'Submit'. Your password will then be emailed to you.

Thank you for your support of Prospect and we hope that you enjoy everything the site has to offer.

This site uses cookies to improve the user experience. By using this site, you agree that we can set and use these cookies. For more details on the cookies we use and how to manage them, see our Privacy and Cookie Policy.