If Britain left with no deal, their rage would simply move from the institution in Brussels to the one in Genevaby Alex Dean / August 20, 2018 / Leave a comment
As the prospect of a “no deal” Brexit again rears its ugly head, attention has focussed in on the meaning of “WTO terms.” Brexiteers insist that Britain could cope—even thrive—if it fell back on them. On the phone last week Jacob Rees-Mogg assured me: “it is a well-established system” and “not something to be frightened of.”
Most commentary has focussed on the fact that Brexiteers are wrong, with Remainers explaining that no deal would in reality be disastrous.
They are right to be worried. But there is something else worth teasing out here, for the bizarre thing about Leavers agitating for no deal is not just that they underestimate the damage; there is something more unusual going on.
The fact is that having willed the outcome on us, Leavers would be the first to attack the WTO the moment we fell off the cliff. In fact, we would quickly find Brexiteers who wanted to leave it. They would move seamlessly from criticism of the institution in Brussels to criticism of the one in Geneva.
Consider first the criticisms that Leavers make of the EU. To hardline Brexiteers, as we know, EU membership is a grotesque infringement on national sovereignty: the customs union stops us from striking trade deals, while European law has primacy over our own. The institution is stuffed with unelected bureaucrats. These allegations will be familiar to anyone who follows British politics.
While not a view I share, this is perfectly coherent so far. The problem is that if you’re going to take issue with those things, you probably have to take issue with the WTO too. For the WTO compels its members t…