Magazine
Latest Issue

Why Tarantino matters

Christopher Tookey compares Tarantino's films with Evelyn Waugh's novels

In the past 12 months, I must have browsed through dozens of articles “celebrating” 100 years of cinema. Most read like funeral orations. They express either nostalgia for a vanished era of Hollywood elegance, or lament the demise of a promising art form.

One name is used, again and again, to signify everything that has gone wrong with modern movies: Quentin Tarantino. He has replaced Arnold Schwarzenegger as the iconic figure of the “new brutalism.” His films are slammed for plundering the ideas of others, for hiding within genre rather than confronting real life. Tarantino’s affection for sleaze is denounced…

Register today to continue reading

You’ve hit your limit of three articles in the last 30 days. To get seven more, simply enter your email address below.

You’ll also receive our free e-book Prospect’s Top Thinkers 2020 and our newsletter with the best new writing on politics, economics, literature and the arts.

Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with newsletters, subscription offers and other relevant information.

Click here to learn more about these purposes and how we use your data. You will be able to opt-out of further contact on the next page and in all our communications.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to letters@prospect-magazine.co.uk

More From Prospect