Phillip Blond’s cover story makes a good case for localism, but he seems to think his proposals require a rejection of liberalism, whereas in fact they are simply the natural outgrowth of liberal ideas. He is also grossly mistaken in some of the characteristics he attributes to liberalism.
In particular, he confuses liberalism with anarchism. Liberalism, he rightly says, emerged to resist the absolutism of monarchs, but he goes on to claim that the defence of individual liberty became so extreme that “each man was obliged to refuse the dictates of any other.” As such, it required “the repudiation of…
Register today to continue reading
You’ve hit your limit of three articles in the last 30 days. To get seven more, simply enter your email address below.
You’ll also receive our free e-book Prospect’s Top Thinkers 2020 and our newsletter with the best new writing on politics, economics, literature and the arts.
Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with newsletters, subscription offers and other relevant information.
Click here to learn more about these purposes and how we use your data. You will be able to opt-out of further contact on the next page and in all our communications.
Already a subscriber? Log in here