• Home
  • About us
  • Contact Us
  • Date/Time
  • Login
  • Subscribe

logo

  • Home
  • Politics
  • Economics & Finance
  • World
  • Arts & Books
  • Life
  • Science
  • Philosophy
  • Subscribe
  • Events
Home
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • Politics
  • Economics & Finance
  • World
  • Arts & Books
  • Life
  • Science
  • Philosophy
  • Subscribe
  • Events
  • Home
  • Arts & Books

Lies, damn lies, hits and views

by Tom Chatfield / February 6, 2008 / Leave a comment
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Email

Internet statistics offer a beguiling mixture of detail and imprecision. Endless data about individual web users’ habits lies at our fingertips, yet considerable confusion awaits anyone who wants to know how “popular” their (let alone anyone else’s) website is. What’s the best measure to use, and how accurate is it? What is a “good,” or even a respectable, result? And how can this be turned into revenue?

To cover basic ground briefly, the number of hits a website claims to receive tells you the number of requests its server gets for file downloads over a certain period of time. Every web-page can have many files—text, images, sounds—so this is usually a large number that doesn’t accurately reflect popularity, especially on complex pages with many images and scripts. A page view is a slightly better stat, in that it tells you how many distinct pages are accessed from a server, counting each page once no matter how complex it may be in terms of files. Counting visits is still better, in that it attempts to count each individual visit to a site only once within a given time (a set “session” length), no matter how many pages are viewed by each visitor.

Best of all is a site’s unique visitors, which records the number of individual internet users who access a site within a given time period (usually a day, week or month). So, for instance, when a site talks about its unique monthly visitors, each internet user logging onto the site—as uniquely identified by data swapped between their computer and the site in question—can count only once towards the total. For example, individual sites such as personal blogs may get only between zero and 50 unique visits each day; young blogs that have begun to develop a following may get up to 500 uniques a day; more mature blogs might hope for 1,000 or more; well-linked, well-established blogs may start reaching over 10,000; while internationally-read, opinion-forming ones can pass 50,000 or even 100,000.

Such statistics are only the beginning of the debate. There are, for a start, all sorts of problems with properly identifying visitors as unique—and then there are the equally pressing questions of quality and quantity. Take last year’s heated debate over which “quality” UK newspaper had the most-visited website. Somewhat dubiously, the Telegraph claimed this honour in its advertising, despite the fact that, by most measures, it only ranks around third, behind the Guardian and the Times. The Advertising Standards Authority, however, upheld the Telegraph‘s claim on the basis that it could be claimed that more people had used the Telegraph site than any other paper’s over a certain period of time, according to one particular statistical measure.

The problem is, of course, that there are a number of rival ratings systems in existence for measuring the stats on big websites, and each measures slightly different things. NielsenNetratings, comScore, HitWise and ABCe are four commonly used systems, all of which produce data based on samples of audiences rather than raw server statistics (seeing as they don’t actually have server logs for the sites they measure). Of these, it was only HitWise—which measures size in terms of market share based on numbers of visits over the course of a month—that ranked the Telegraph top, and only then among UK users. And this ignored the fact that, while the Telegraph runs its entire web arm off a single domain, www.telegraph.co.uk, papers like the Guardian have a web presence at multiple domains.

At the end of the day, the people to whom such statistics really matter are advertisers; and what really matters to advertisers is a website’s relationship with the products they’re trying to sell. The number of times an ad is clicked on is, for instance, a far more valuable figure than any number of visitors; while the “stickiness” (how long people linger) of a page is more crucial than how many times it is seen. Certain words and google optimizations can pull in thousands of visitors to a page—but giving users something they’ll linger over, return to, and possibly follow an advertising link from presents a rather different challenge. With online advertising models becoming steadily more sophisticated, and companies increasingly realising that having lots of users and making a website profitable are rather different propositions, don’t expect anyone to take you seriously if you can’t muster a sufficient contempt for the crudity of almost all the “old” standards…

Go to comments

Related articles

Johnson interview: how the BBC failed to uphold robust journalistic practice
Roger Mosey / December 2, 2019
Consent for the licence fee depends on showing integrity in tough times, says a former...
Share with friends
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Email

Comments

No comments yet

Prospect's free newsletter

The big ideas that are shaping our world—straight to your inbox. PLUS a free e-book and 7 articles of your choosing on the Prospect website.

Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with our newsletter, subscription offers and other relevant information. Click here to learn more about these purposes and how we use your data. You will be able to opt-out of further contact on the next page and in all our communications.

This Month's Magazine

Perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus.

Inside the choice facing voters this General Election—and why the commission that regulates our democracy is struggling to keep up. Plus: Clive James on Wittgenstein, and the real story of Corbynism

Subscribe

Most Popular

  • Read
  • Commented

Is the G7 a dead parrot?

Yes, we should return the Elgin Marbles—and all the other spoils of colonialism

Don't compare Douglas Ford to Donald Trump

Brexiteers hoping that Australia will ride to the rescue are in for a nasty shock

Just how special is human existence? The answer could lie in multiverse theory

Ivan Rogers on Brexit: the worst is yet to come

3 Comments

John le Carré's post-Cold War vision is shot through with a sense of longing

2 Comments

How dare those signed up to hard Brexit lecture Labour on the economy?

2 Comments

Why the London result will decide the next General Election

1 Comments

The precarious success of the national minimum wage

1 Comments

About this author

Tom Chatfield
Tom Chatfield is an associate editor at Prospect. His latest book is "How to Thrive in a Digital Age" (Pan Macmillan)
  • Follow Tom on:
  • Twitter
More by this author

More by Tom Chatfield

What does a successful surveillance strategy look like?
January 17, 2015
Martin Amis’s 1982 space invasion
February 29, 2012
Bridging the gap
November 16, 2011

Next Prospect events

  • Details

    Prospect Book Club - David Lammy

    London, 2020-03-19

  • Details

    Prospect Book Club - Jack Shenker

    2020-02-17

  • Details

    Prospect Book Club - Amelia Gentleman

    2020-01-27

See more events

Sponsored features

  • Delivering the UK's invisible infrastructure project

  • Future of Aid: the full report

  • A forest fund for the future

  • A new humanitarianism for the modern age

  • The future of sustainable economic development

PrimeTime

The magazine is owned and supported by the Resolution Group, as part of its not-for-profit, public interest activities.

Follow us
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • RSS

Editorial

Editor: Tom Clark
Deputy Editor: Steve Bloomfield
Managing Editor (Arts & Books): Sameer Rahim
Head of Digital: Stephanie Boland
Digital Assistant: Rebecca Liu
Production Editor & Designer: Chris Tilbury
Commissioning Editor: Alex Dean
Creative Director: Mike Turner
US Writer-at-Large: Sam Tanenhaus

Commercial

Commercial Director: Alex Stevenson
Head of Marketing: Paul Mortimer
Marketing and Circulation Executive: Susan Acan
Head of Events: Victoria Jackson
Events Project Manager: Nadine Prospere
Head of Advertising Sales: Adam Kinlan 020 3372 2934
Head of Key Accounts: Scott Smith 020 3372 2972
Senior Account Manager: Patrick Lappin 020 3372 2931

  • Home
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Acceptable Use Policy
© Prospect Publishing Limited
×
Login
Login with your subscriber account:
You need a valid subscription to login.
I am
Remember Me


Forgotten password?

Or enter with social networking:
Login to post comments using social media accounts.
  • With Twitter
  • Connect
  • With Google +
×
Register Now

Register today and access any 7 articles on the Prospect’s website for FREE in the next 30 days..
PLUS find out about the big ideas that will shape our world—with Prospect’s FREE newsletter sent to your inbox. We'll even send you our e-book—Writing with punch—with some of the finest writing from the Prospect archive, at no extra cost!

Not Now, Thanks

Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with our newsletter, subscription offers and other relevant information.

Click to learn more about these interests and how we use your data. You will be able to object to this processing on the next page and in all our communications.

×
You’ve got full access!

It looks like you are a Prospect subscriber.

Prospect subscribers have full access to all the great content on our website, including our entire archive.

If you do not know your login details, simply close this pop-up and click 'Login' on the black bar at the top of the screen, then click 'Forgotten password?', enter your email address and press 'Submit'. Your password will then be emailed to you.

Thank you for your support of Prospect and we hope that you enjoy everything the site has to offer.

This site uses cookies to improve the user experience. By using this site, you agree that we can set and use these cookies. For more details on the cookies we use and how to manage them, see our Privacy and Cookie Policy.