Trump's decision is unconscionable. But key US states and cities are already signed up to tackle climate changeby Gareth Redmond-King / June 1, 2017 / Leave a comment
So, despite the efforts of Merkel, Macron, Trudeau, Abe, Gentiloni and May this weekend, despite the case made by his own Secretary of State (a former fossil fuel company boss), his Defence Secretary, US businesses and, we understand, his own daughter, Donald Trump is withdrawing the United States of America from the Paris Agreement.
Stepping back from a leadership role on climate change, the US now joins Nicaragua and Syria—the two countries who chose not to sign up to Paris in the first place.
This is bad news. For the second largest emitter of greenhouse gases not to be part of international efforts to tackle climate change—when almost the rest of the planet has committed to try and keep warming to 1.5 degrees—is unconscionable. We should shake our heads, stamp our feet, shout and, obviously, tweet.
But is it terrible news? And is it terrible news just for America, or for the whole world?
A global alliance
Huge energy (clean and fossil), food and tech companies have told Trump that the US should remain in the Paris deal—arguing both that it’s the right thing, and the economically sound thing to do. There are more US jobs in solar than coal, and some of the highest densities of investment and jobs in clean energy are in red states like Texas and Oklahoma. So if America backs away from investing in clean energy development to deliver on the Paris Agreement, what happens to those jobs and that investment?
Well, maybe it’s not such bad news for Americans. As the EU and China announce collaboration to fill the vacuum left by the US, are those companies really going to withdraw their investment and leave the way clear for Chinese and European companies to step in and reap the benefits and profits instead? I suspect not. And as it’s those investments that are needed to deliver on what was in Obama’s now-repealed Clean Power Plan, maybe the knock-on implications of Trump’s Paris pull-out are not so bad for the world either.
The power of individual states
Not just businesses—what of individual US states? Some of these are huge global actors in their own right. California (whose GDP would be in the world’s top ten if it were a nation) and New York (which would be in the top 15) are leading the way in the US with ambitions to cut emissions by far more than the US committed to in its soon-to-be-obsolete Paris contribution. If states stick to their plans, as they’ve said they intend to, then is a US withdrawal from Paris such bad news?