Trump's decision is unconscionable. But key US states and cities are already signed up to tackle climate changeby Gareth Redmond-King / June 1, 2017 / Leave a comment
So, despite the efforts of Merkel, Macron, Trudeau, Abe, Gentiloni and May this weekend, despite the case made by his own Secretary of State (a former fossil fuel company boss), his Defence Secretary, US businesses and, we understand, his own daughter, Donald Trump is withdrawing the United States of America from the Paris Agreement.
Stepping back from a leadership role on climate change, the US now joins Nicaragua and Syria—the two countries who chose not to sign up to Paris in the first place.
This is bad news. For the second largest emitter of greenhouse gases not to be part of international efforts to tackle climate change—when almost the rest of the planet has committed to try and keep warming to 1.5 degrees—is unconscionable. We should shake our heads, stamp our feet, shout and, obviously, tweet.
But is it terrible news? And is it terrible news just for America, or for the whole world?
A global alliance
Huge energy (clean and fossil), food and tech companies have told Trump that the US should remain in the Paris deal—arguing both that it’s the right thing, and the economically sound thing to do. There are more US jobs in solar than coal, and some of the highest densities of investment and jobs in clean energy are in red states like Texas and Oklahoma. So if America backs away from investing in clean energy development to deliver on the Paris Agreement, what happens to those jobs and that investment?