The Brexit debate focuses on Chequers when the most important thing now is the “backstop”by Jill Rutter / August 31, 2018 / Leave a comment
As parliament returns from its summer break, the autumn agenda will be dominated by Brexit. There is a very real risk that negotiations break down and we leave with no deal.
But while the debate in the UK focusses on whether the prime minister’s so-called Chequers deal still lives—or is a dead deal walking, with few advocates beyond the PM herself and her deputy David Lidington, it is important to remember that that is not the most urgent issue. The most important thing this autumn is the withdrawal agreement.
Back in December, the UK and the EU27 agreed a joint report—which settled our financial obligations, set out the guarantees for citizens of the EU and UK and included a big slab of fudge on how to reconcile hard Brexit with the agreed commitment to avoid a hard Irish border. That allowed the European Council to declare “sufficient progress” and it gave the greenlight to start talking about the future relationship in parallel with finalising the withdrawal agreement.
By March, Michel Barnier and David Davis could brandish a legal text of the UK’s withdrawal treaty with hefty dollops of green, signaling that sections had been signed off. But there were still areas of disagreement. The big outstanding issue was how to translate Irish fudge into more precise legal text. The UK offered no proposals: the EU offered a draft protocol for the so-called “Irish backstop” which the prime minister within hours had said neither she nor any other UK PM could accept. The price for avoiding a hard land border would be a border between Northern Ireland and Great Britain in the Irish Sea.