The scary science of continental driftby James Randerson / February 14, 2017 / Leave a comment
Published in March 2017 issue of Prospect Magazine
Imagine you were a member of a club where for every pound you put in, you got £1.24 back; a club that allows you to work with the best talent from across a whole continent, and each year gives 15,000 of your students a life-changing experience abroad.
Sounds good, doesn’t it? That’s what the European Union looks like from the perspective of British science. It’s no wonder that on 24th June 2016 scientists were so prominent among the 16,141,241 despairing Remain voters. All sorts of questions now hang over the future of science. Worries about researchers leaving, and UK scientists being nudged out of European projects are already beginning to be borne out.
Science is not just another bleating special interest: the fate of the economy as a whole rests on it. Philip Hammond recognised this in the Autumn Statement, when he put an extra £4.7bn into scientific research in the years up to 2020-21. British science has always punched above its weight—with 0.9 per cent of the world’s population and 3.2 per cent of R&D spend, the UK produces 16 per cent of the top-notch research. Our Nobel prize tally is second only to the United States. But if a post-Brexit Britain is going to make it big on the world stage then it will need to turbo-charge this even further. Will that be possible if we are frozen out of EU science?
Money is the first concern. Last year, the UK got €1.2bn through the EU’s main science programme—that’s 16 per cent of the total, more than the 13 per cent net-of-rebate contribution that we pay into the overall EU budget. Another lost funding source will be the portion of structural investment funds that goes on research and innovation—€1.6bn between 2014 and 2020. Brexiteers respond that since this was (mostly) our money anyway, leaving will simp…