The prime minister in 2020 will have to set up a review committeeby Colin Talbot / May 31, 2018 / Leave a comment
The passing of the Fixed-term Parliaments Act in 2011 has engendered no end of confusion amongst politicians, commentators and even some legal analysts.
Many commentators who ought to know better have carried on talking about “votes of confidence” and “confidence and supply” as if nothing much has changed. This “the conventions still apply” attitude has been reinforced by Theresa May’s ability to call a general election in June 2017—almost three years earlier than the scheduled May 2020 vote.
But one little noticed provision of the Act could, just possibly, cause even more “fun and games” of a very different sort in the second half of 2020.
Section 7 of the Act requires the prime minister to make arrangements to carry out a review of the Act “between June and November 2020.” This would have been as the second cycle of five years had just started (May 2020) but now it almost falls in the middle of the second parliament elected under the terms of the Act (2015-17 and 2017-22).
This clause was inserted into the Act in 2011 after the House of Lords tried to insert a “sunrise” clause that would require every new parliament to renew the Act. The compromise was the 2020 “review.”
So the prime minister—whoever it is by then—is legally obliged to set up a review committee in the second half of 2020 to “if appropriate make recommendations for the repeal or amendment of the Act.” A majority of the committee must be MPs.
Obviously, it is impossible to predict what the political situation will be by then. We may, or may not, have left the European Union. We may, or may not, be in some sort of transitional limbo between “out” and “in….