How Remain could lead to Scottish Independence

It's often suggested that Brexit could lead to the break-up of the UK. But could the reverse be true?

by Martin Kettle / July 19, 2018 / Leave a comment

Published in August 2018 issue of Prospect Magazine

First Minister Nicola Sturgeon. Could the UK staying in actually lead to Scotland going? Photo: PA

When England and Wales voted to leave the EU in 2016 but Scotland voted to stay, many—not least in the SNP—thought Brexit would break the Union. Theresa May’s absolute insistence that the UK as a whole had voted to leave seemed designed to provoke Scots into revolt.

It hasn’t worked out that way. Try as she might, Nicola Sturgeon has failed to persuade Scots that a break with Europe should herald a break with England. Scottish opinion has proved stubbornly hard to win over.

Scottish separatists are more divided over the EU than the SNP likes to admit, and the party slipped back in the 2017 election. Better the Unionist devil you know, perhaps; especially because, after Brexit, Scotland might have to join the eurozone and maybe Schengen if it wanted to get back into the EU.

But, if Brexit is now reversed, what then? Suddenly the uncertainty factor that has frustrated all Sturgeon’s efforts to fan the pro-independence mood would disappear. The nationalist offer would suddenly be on more solid and predictable ground.

Going it alone politically could seem an awful lot easier with Scotland safely back inside a single market, not just with the other 27 EU member states, but with England too. And if staying in the EU led to an uptick of economic optimism, then it might be just time for another shot at independence.

Scots would be able to say that enough is enough for the political Union with England—an England that had played fast and loose with Scottish interests during the now aborted Brexit process—and now safe in the knowledge that the economics was solid and sorted….

YOU’VE HIT THE LIMIT

You have now reached your limit of 3 free articles in the last 30 days.
But don’t worry! You can get another 7 articles absolutely free, simply by entering your email address in the box below.

When you register we’ll also send you a free e-book—Writing with punch—which includes some of the finest writing from our archive of 22 years. And we’ll also send you a weekly newsletter with the best new ideas in politics and philosophy of culture, which you can of course unsubscribe from at any time

Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with our newsletter, subscription offers and other relevant information.

Click to learn more about these interests and how we use your data. You will be able to object to this processing on the next page and in all our communications.

20827834615c46665db99c73.30516455

Go to comments

The UN's human rights chief has had enough

Tom Fletcher / July 23, 2018

Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein has reached the end of his tether— and now he’s speaking out

What football can teach us about the philosophy of regret

Jake Wojtowicz / July 23, 2018

Should a footballer feel bad for missing a penalty? Bernard Williams's notion of...

Comments

GREGORYHUGH_ARROWSMITH
July 21, 2018 at 21:50
Not buying it. With Indyref, the signals from Brussels were that Scotland would have to re-apply to join the EU if it seceded from the UK, so the economics are only "solid and sorted" on the assumption that it stays. For an independent Scotland to get a good deal from the EU, it would have to demonstrate it had been ripped from it against its will. Choosing to secede from a country that is a member doesn't qualify, so Brexit would have to come first. But Brexit has opened our eyes to the sensitivities around the land borders of the UK's nations. There will be no majority in Scotland for choosing an invisible border with the EU over an invisible border with England. The SNP's ambitions are stymied if Brexit happens and if it doesn't. It must find a different tune to sing for many years to come.