Latest Issue

Private view

Keith Arnatt's photos depict dog turds and rubbish—but they are also about the medium of photography. Why has this great artist been so ignored?

By Ben Lewis   August 2007

The typology by which we sort the many forms of artistic production today is unconvincing at the best of times, but no shorthand definition is as senseless as the distinction made between photography and “art photography”—that is, between photographers who are exhibited in photography galleries and those shown in art galleries. Scores of mediocre photographers have ended up in the glamorous and lucrative art gallery camp, thanks to the pretentious intervention of an ambitious curator. And scores of brilliant photographers, lacking such champions, have been confined to the unjustly low-ranking exhibition spaces of photography co-ops, press agencies and galleries of…

Register today to continue reading

You’ve hit your limit of three articles in the last 30 days. To get seven more, simply enter your email address below.

You’ll also receive our free e-book Prospect’s Top Thinkers 2020 and our newsletter with the best new writing on politics, economics, literature and the arts.

Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with newsletters, subscription offers and other relevant information.

Click here to learn more about these purposes and how we use your data. You will be able to opt-out of further contact on the next page and in all our communications.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to

More From Prospect