The draft withdrawal agreement would severely curtail the advantages of leavingby Ruth Lea / November 21, 2018 / Leave a comment
The draft Brexit Withdrawal Agreement, all 585 pages of it, was released last week, alongside the outline of the political declaration for the “future relationship,” comprising just seven pages. The documents had a mixed reception, and no wonder, for the government does not seem to be pursuing a proper Brexit at all.
The Withdrawal Agreement confirmed much of what we already knew. We are expected to make a considerable financial payment (estimated at £35-39bn) and there will be an implementation period after Brexit Day, during which it is planned that we will negotiate the future relationship. During this period, the UK will de facto remain a member of the EU, conforming to all the rules and regulations, even though de jure we will be a third country and no longer a member of the EU’s institutions.
In addition, the Withdrawal Agreement fleshed out the Northern Ireland “backstop,” one of two options intended to become operative if the “future relationship” is not ready. The second option is an extension of the transition period.
The proposals relating to the “backstop” are, in my view, draconian. Firstly, the UK and the EU will be in a “single customs territory,” in which the UK will align tariffs and rules to the EU’s. Secondly, there will be wide-ranging regulatory alignment to ensure a “level playing field,” relating to the EU’s state aid rules, competition policy, labour and social protection, and environmental protection. Thirdly, concerning Northern Ireland, there will be additional alignment conditions and checks on goods. And, finally, any termination of…