Magazine
Latest Issue

Martina Hingis and doping

By William Skidelsky  

The news that Martina Hingis tested positive for cocaine at this year’s Wimbledon, and would therefore have faced a two-year ban from tennis had she not taken matters into her own hands by retiring, highlights one of the glaring absurdities of sport’s anti-doping regulations. If Hingis did indeed take cocaine—and it is a charge she denies—then it is patently obvious that she didn’t do so for performance-enhancing reasons. Cocaine—along with cannabis, speed, LSD, ecstasy and all other recreational drugs—would only retard an athelete’s performance. Surely, the sole purpose of drugs testing should be to determine whether athletes have taken substances…

Register today to continue reading

You’ve hit your limit of three articles in the last 30 days. To get seven more, simply enter your email address below.

You’ll also receive our free e-book Prospect’s Top Thinkers 2020 and our newsletter with the best new writing on politics, economics, literature and the arts.

Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with newsletters, subscription offers and other relevant information.

Click here to learn more about these purposes and how we use your data. You will be able to opt-out of further contact on the next page and in all our communications.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to letters@prospect-magazine.co.uk

More From Prospect