• Home
  • About us
  • Contact Us
  • Date/Time
  • Login
  • Subscribe

logo

  • Home
  • Politics
  • Economics & Finance
  • World
  • Arts & Books
  • Life
  • Science
  • Philosophy
  • Subscribe
  • Events
Home
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • Politics
  • Economics & Finance
  • World
  • Arts & Books
  • Life
  • Science
  • Philosophy
  • Subscribe
  • Events
  • Home
  • Science & Technology

“Active measures”: a history of Russian interference in US elections

Interconnectivity has made it easier than ever—but recent meddling has precedent

by Calder Walton / December 23, 2016 / Leave a comment
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Email
President-Elect Donald Trump speaks during a rally at the Orlando Amphitheater at the Central Florida Fairgrounds, Friday, Dec. 16, 2016, in Orlando, Fla. ©Evan Vucci/AP/Press Association Images

President-Elect Donald Trump at a campaign rally in Orlando ©Evan Vucci/AP/Press Association Images

When, during his election campaign, Donald Trump publicly called for Russia to hack into Hilary Clinton’s emails, he became the first presidential candidate in American history to invite a foreign intelligence operation on a rival candidate.

There are now growing reports that Russia’s intelligence services, it seems with approval of Russia’s leader Vladimir Putin himself, interfered with last month’s US Presidential election. Russian hackers reportedly launched a cyber attack on the Democratic National Committee (DNC), obtained damaging information on Clinton, and then leaked it to outlets like Wikileaks with the aim of assisting Trump’s candidacy.

Even before the election, in October, the Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper, stated that US intelligence was “very confident” that Russia was attempting to influence the US election—which for anyone who knows the field’s usually conservative language, was a forceful comment. Now, the CIA and FBI have concluded that it did. At his final end of year press briefing, Barack Obama stated that, based on uniform US intelligence assessments, the Russians were responsible for hacking the DNC, and added that he had personally told Putin to “cut it out.” The US president has ordered a review before he leaves office next month.

The news has understandably been greeted with public alarm. There is, however, a long history of Moscow directing its intelligence services to interfere in US presidential elections, which makes recent news less surprising—though no less alarming. In order to understand Russia’s apparent cyber-warfare campaigns today, it is important to understand their background.

This is revealed by the extraordinary archive of Soviet foreign intelligence records secretly obtained by a senior KGB archivist, Vasili Mitrokhin, at enormous personal risk, and smuggled to the west in the early 1990s. Mitrokhin collaborated with the world’s leading intelligence historian, Christopher Andrew, to publish the Mitrokhin Archive, some of which has, since 2014, been made publicly available.

The archive shows that during the Cold War, the KGB did not just gather intelligence—invariably in line with what Moscow wanted to hear—but it also undertook a wide variety of what it called “active measures” (aktivinyye meropriatia). The aim here was to influence…

YOU’VE HIT THE LIMIT

You have now reached your limit of 3 free articles in the last 30 days. But don’t worry! You can get another 7 articles absolutely free, simply by entering your email address in the box below.

When you register we’ll also send you a free e-book—Prospect’s Top Thinkers 2020—which salutes the scientists, philosophers and writers reshaping our times. We’ll also send you our weekly newsletter with the best new ideas in politics, economics, history, science, literature and the arts. You can, of course, unsubscribe from this newsletter at any time.







Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with our newsletter, subscription offers and other relevant information.

Click to learn more about these interests and how we use your data. You will be able to object to this processing on the next page and in all our communications.

1644740205fd48a39474ed9.41868763

Go to comments

Related articles

You have misunderstood the threat to liberal democracy
Rafael Behr / December 4, 2020
Why painting today’s tyrants as 20th-century totalitarians lets them off the hook
New election transparency rules—a step in the right direction, but not far enough
Michela Palese and Alan Renwick / August 19, 2020
This stricter plan for online political ads is just one of the changes required to...
Share with friends
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Email

Comments

  1. John K.
    January 1, 2017 at 19:28
    It was obviously hypocritical for president Obama to tell the Russians to "cut out" their interference in the light of what America had done in the past. It is also futile to expect any state not to try and influence the policies of others in its own interest. What is important is that wherever possible attempts to do so covertly should be exposed and, in an era of false news and lying propaganda, that the validity and veracity of what is said in election campaigns and political rivalry be vigorously tested by a truly free press.

Prospect's free newsletter

The big ideas that are shaping our world— straight to your inbox. PLUS receive a free e-book and 7 articles of your choosing on the Prospect website.

Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with our newsletter, subscription offers and other relevant information. Click here to learn more about these purposes and how we use your data. You will be able to opt-out of further contact on the next page and in all our communications.

This Month's Magazine

Perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus.

What is the future of liberalism? Timothy Garton Ash outlines the threats to liberal democracy and how it can renew itself in a post-Trump age. Lionel Barber presents an authoritative institutional portrait of the Treasury and Cal Flyn makes the case for a different kind of climate writing.

Subscribe

Most Popular

  • Read
  • Commented

The future of liberalism

Is the UN fit for purpose?

Boris Johnson is shameless but not stupid. Which is why I think he will fold to get a deal

He was Trotsky’s sidekick and Kahlo’s lover—Jean van Heijenoort is one of the strangest philosophers you’ve never heard of

The food bank paradox

Who killed soft Brexit?

5 Comments

What Labour's antisemitism crisis tells us about Britain

4 Comments

Trump's contempt for how government works has rarely been so stark

4 Comments

You have misunderstood the threat to liberal democracy

4 Comments

How the rumour mill ruined Boris Johnson

3 Comments

About this author

Calder Walton
Calder Walton is an Ernest May Fellow at Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government
  • Follow Calder on:
  • Twitter
More by this author

More by Calder Walton

Trump, Nunes and the politicisation of intelligence
February 7, 2018
Dreaming spies: the inside story of the KGB at Oxford
December 1, 2017
Has Trump just experienced the start of Watergate 2.0?
November 1, 2017

Next Prospect events

  • Details

    Homes for all: what new social and affordable housing can do for Britain

    2021-01-26

  • Details

    Register now to attend the 2020 Think Tank Awards ceremony

    2020-12-15

  • Details

    Watch: The Big Pivot—the third sector post Covid-19

    2020-10-13

See more events

Sponsored features

  • The rule of law—Prospect's new report

  • Why the rule of law is a living culture

  • London, recharged

  • The firmest of foundations

  • Tips for winning the Bennett Prospect Prize

PrimeTime

The magazine is owned and supported by the Resolution Group, as part of its not-for-profit, public interest activities.

Follow us
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • RSS

Editorial

Editor: Tom Clark
Managing Editor (Arts & Books): Sameer Rahim
Senior Editor: Alex Dean
Head of Digital: Chris Tilbury
Production Editor: David McAllister
Creative Director: Mike Turner
Assistant Editor: Rebecca Liu
Editorial Assistant: Emily Lawford
US Writer-at-Large: Sam Tanenhaus

Editorial enquiries: 020 7255 1344
Subscription enquiries: 0330 333 0173

Commercial

Commercial Director: Alex Stevenson
Head of Marketing: Paul Mortimer
Marketing and Circulation Executive: Susan Acan
Head of Advertising Sales: Adam Kinlan 020 3372 2934
Head of Finance and Resources: David de Lange

  • Home
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Acceptable Use Policy
© Prospect Publishing Limited
×
Login
Login with your subscriber account:
You need a valid subscription to login.
I am
Remember Me


Forgotten password?

Or enter with social networking:
Login to post comments using social media accounts.
  • With Twitter
  • Connect
  • With Google +
×
Register Now

REGISTER NOW

Register today and access any 7 articles on the Prospect website FREE in the next 30 days.

PLUS you’ll find out about the big ideas that will shape our world with Prospect’s newsletter and receive our Top Thinkers e-book free.

Not Now, Thanks

Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with our newsletter, subscription offers and other relevant information.

Click to learn more about these interests and how we use your data. You will be able to object to this processing on the next page and in all our communications.

×
You’ve got full access!

It looks like you are a Prospect subscriber.

Prospect subscribers have full access to all the great content on our website, including our entire archive.

If you do not know your login details, simply close this pop-up and click 'Login' on the black bar at the top of the screen, then click 'Forgotten password?', enter your email address and press 'Submit'. Your password will then be emailed to you.

Thank you for your support of Prospect and we hope that you enjoy everything the site has to offer.

This site uses cookies to improve the user experience. By using this site, you agree that we can set and use these cookies. For more details on the cookies we use and how to manage them, see our Privacy and Cookie Policy.