• Home
  • About us
  • Contact Us
  • Date/Time
  • Login
  • Subscribe

logo

  • Home
  • Politics
  • Economics & Finance
  • World
  • Arts & Books
  • Life
  • Science
  • Philosophy
  • Subscribe
  • Events
Home
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • Politics
  • Economics & Finance
  • World
  • Arts & Books
  • Life
  • Science
  • Philosophy
  • Subscribe
  • Events
  • Home
  • Politics

How the media failed Grenfell

The tragedy was both predictable and preventable. Yet neither politicians nor the press fully heeded the lessons of earlier disasters until it was too late

by Kurt Barling / November 1, 2019 / Leave a comment
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Email

A forensics officer inspects debris at the scene of a fire in Lakanal House. Photo: PA

Let’s start with a simple fact: the fire at Grenfell Tower was predictable and preventable. And it could still happen somewhere else today. It happened because local, city and national governments failed to intervene on fire safety the last time they were called on to do so.

At the conclusion of the 2013 inquest into the 2009 Lakanal House fire, which killed six people, ministers and public officials were given firm recommendations by the coroner. At the core of these was the advice that the “stay put” policy—which advises residents of tower blocks to stay in their homes, to compartmentalise the fire – be reviewed.

A failure to rectify big holes in the fire safety regime for public housing made a fire like the one at Grenfell Tower almost inevitable—even after the hard lessons learned in the wake of Lakanal. One of my abiding memories as a special correspondent for the BBC covering the Lakanal House inquest, was when a witness said: “I can’t imagine what would have happened if this fire had broken out at night.” Now we know.

Blame game

There is a sense in which the plight of residents—so much in the news in the wake of Grenfell—was poorly served by the media in the years after Lakanal. Little public scrutiny, for example, of whether the recommendations of the Lakanal inquest had been implemented, and little outrage at politicians passing the buck when changes were clearly necessary. When disaster befell Grenfell, journalistic overdrive could not bring back those lost lives. Journalists had missed the boat.

Emily Bell, formerly of the Guardian, said it was a sign of the demise of a robust local press. There is something to be said for that argument. No investigative instincts were needed to pick up on the fire safety risks that the Grenfell Action Group repeatedly raised on their public website—journalists just needed to convince an editor it was a story worth telling.

I’m afraid the evidence shows that between 2013 and 2017, journalism failed to hold those responsible for fire safety to account—with the exception of specialist journal Inside Housing, which made this a key topic of interest.

For the media to now condemn the London Fire Brigade for the problems at…

YOU’VE HIT THE LIMIT

You have now reached your limit of 3 free articles in the last 30 days.
But don’t worry! You can get another 7 articles absolutely free, simply by entering your email address in the box below.

When you register we’ll also send you a free e-book—Writing with punch—which includes some of the finest writing from our archive of 22 years. And we’ll also send you a weekly newsletter with the best new ideas in politics and philosophy of culture, which you can of course unsubscribe from at any time







Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with our newsletter, subscription offers and other relevant information.

Click to learn more about these interests and how we use your data. You will be able to object to this processing on the next page and in all our communications.

6516094235e6632c29d0c51.14883351

Go to comments

Related articles

The creative industries are hurting, not helping artists—we need a new model
Oli Mould / September 9, 2019
A holdover from Tony Blair's "Cool Britannia" vision, the New Labour invention has turned...
You cannot wish away the hard choices inherent in Brexit
David Henig / September 10, 2019
A sensible compromise remains the only way forward, despite bluster on both sides
Share with friends
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Email

Comments

No comments yet

Prospect's free newsletter

The big ideas that are shaping our world—straight to your inbox. PLUS a free e-book and 7 articles of your choosing on the Prospect website.

Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with our newsletter, subscription offers and other relevant information. Click here to learn more about these purposes and how we use your data. You will be able to opt-out of further contact on the next page and in all our communications.

This Month's Magazine

Perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus.

Inside the Scottish town built on the arms trade. Plus: What Keir Starmer really believes, a history of Virago, and Thomas Piketty's new theory of everything

Subscribe

Most Popular

  • Read
  • Commented

From "deep state" leaks to drinking bleach, research shows these coronavirus conspiracy theories could be as dangerous as the disease itself

Demise of a dictator: How will the world remember Sudan's Omar al-Bashir?

"Just a flu" or global panic? This is why some people are much more afraid of coronavirus than others

Brexit and the final defeat of honesty

4 Comments

This reshuffle bore the hallmarks of prime ministerial weakness, not strength 


3 Comments

"Populism" can be a helpful term—but in 2020, it's being increasingly misused

3 Comments

Sinn Féin's result is historic—but it's a long way from a united Ireland

2 Comments

The unpalatable lesson of coronavirus: dictatorships can be effective

2 Comments

About this author

Kurt Barling
Kurt Barling is Professor of Journalism, Middlesex University
More by this author

Next Prospect events

  • Details

    Prospect Book Club - Hadley Freeman

    2020-06-15

  • Details

    Prospect Book Club - John Kay and Mervyn King

    London, 2020-05-05

  • Details

    Prospect Book Club - Oliver Letwin

    London, 2020-04-20

See more events

Sponsored features

  • Nest's Zoe Alexander: Automatic enrolment has revolutionised the UK's saving landscape—here's why that matters

  • What can science do for Britain?

  • Why are we so quick to shame others?

  • Is the UK cyber resilient?

  • Finding solutions to the UK's air pollution problem

PrimeTime

The magazine is owned and supported by the Resolution Group, as part of its not-for-profit, public interest activities.

Follow us
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • RSS

Editorial

Editor: Tom Clark
Deputy Editor: Steve Bloomfield
Managing Editor (Arts & Books): Sameer Rahim
Head of Digital: Stephanie Boland
Digital Assistant: Rebecca Liu
Production Editor & Designer: Chris Tilbury
Commissioning Editor: Alex Dean
Creative Director: Mike Turner
US Writer-at-Large: Sam Tanenhaus

Commercial

Commercial Director: Alex Stevenson
Head of Marketing: Paul Mortimer
Marketing and Circulation Executive: Susan Acan
Head of Events: Victoria Jackson
Events Project Manager: Nadine Prospere
Head of Advertising Sales: Adam Kinlan 020 3372 2934
Senior Account Manager: Patrick Lappin 020 3372 2931
Head of Key Accounts Harriet Radcliffe 020 3372 2972
Head of Finance and Resources: David de Lange

  • Home
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Acceptable Use Policy
© Prospect Publishing Limited
×
Login
Login with your subscriber account:
You need a valid subscription to login.
I am
Remember Me


Forgotten password?

Or enter with social networking:
Login to post comments using social media accounts.
  • With Twitter
  • Connect
  • With Google +
×
Register Now

Register today and access any 7 articles on the Prospect’s website for FREE in the next 30 days..
PLUS find out about the big ideas that will shape our world—with Prospect’s FREE newsletter sent to your inbox. We'll even send you our e-book—Writing with punch—with some of the finest writing from the Prospect archive, at no extra cost!

Not Now, Thanks

Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with our newsletter, subscription offers and other relevant information.

Click to learn more about these interests and how we use your data. You will be able to object to this processing on the next page and in all our communications.

×
You’ve got full access!

It looks like you are a Prospect subscriber.

Prospect subscribers have full access to all the great content on our website, including our entire archive.

If you do not know your login details, simply close this pop-up and click 'Login' on the black bar at the top of the screen, then click 'Forgotten password?', enter your email address and press 'Submit'. Your password will then be emailed to you.

Thank you for your support of Prospect and we hope that you enjoy everything the site has to offer.

This site uses cookies to improve the user experience. By using this site, you agree that we can set and use these cookies. For more details on the cookies we use and how to manage them, see our Privacy and Cookie Policy.