Our twentieth-century copyright and property laws aren’t fit for a twenty-first century worldby Sam Moore / March 23, 2018 / Leave a comment
This morning, something happened that would shock anybody that’s seen the film The Social Network. Mark Zuckerberg said sorry. The Facebook founder apologised for what he called a “breach of trust” arising from the dealings between Facebook and Cambridge Analytica, which allegedly harvested users’ data without their consent, and then used it to psychologically profile them and, in some cases, deliver them pro-Trump material on Facebook.
This raises a lot of questions—beyond just what all of this means in a purely technical sense. It also forces us to ask questions about this data: who should own it, and what can be done when it gets used. Essentially, the question becomes one about human and property rights, and about how we need to reconsider them in a world where technology and social media have become more and more ubiquitous. Beyond all of the technical jargon, the Cambridge Analytica data breach is really about people.
This is the sort of thing that the U.S. Supreme Court debated some time ago, coming to a conclusion straight out of science-fiction: that corporations are people. This led to, among other things, an artist turning herself into a corporation and putting a concrete price on her personal data.
But even that story is a few years old. Now, with companies expanding and moving to the internet, the questions of their apparent humanity rights, as well as the rights of their uses, needs to be reconsidered.