There is no reliable way to incorporate the upcoming Brexit upheaval into a view of what price should be paid for investmentsby Andy Davis / June 21, 2017 / Leave a comment
Published in July 2017 issue of Prospect Magazine
What a mess. A snap election has sown confusion just as Brexit moves to the top of the political agenda, where it will remain for years to come—whoever is in charge. A crucial process is now highly uncertain and our negotiating hand looks very much weaker. Investors and markets seeking certainty on the terms of our departure will have to wait and although hopes may rise for “softer” outcome major risks remain.
In the areas I look at, any loss of European Union funding for British venture capital investment (equivalent to a third of the total committed from 2011-15, according to the FT) will have to be made up; as will any decline in European research funding for British universities. This spending fuels innovation and ultimately creates jobs—we have no choice but to continue.
Equally, the Conservatives’ aspiration to cut immigration leaves many businesses facing nasty skills shortages that would stunt their growth. Modern high-value economies depend on skilled individuals—arguing that we should impose an arbitrary ceiling on our access to the world’s talent pool, rather than one that bears some relation to our economy’s requirements, is foolish, even allowing for its value as election campaign rhetoric.
Well before we went to the polls it was obvious that taxes in the UK must rise to prevent vital public services from deteriorating beyond the point of no return. This is partly because the UK’s working-age population is shrinking, relative to those too old or young to work. A smaller proportion of people working and paying tax inevitably equals more tax per head. On top of this we must also fund our eventual EU “divorce settlement.” Even if the mooted €100bn bill is bargained down, it will absorb scarce cash.
For all these reasons, the approaching r…