• Home
  • About us
  • Contact Us
  • Date/Time
  • Login
  • Subscribe

logo

  • Home
  • Politics
  • Economics & Finance
  • World
  • Arts & Books
  • Life
  • Science
  • Philosophy
  • Subscribe
  • Events
Home
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • Politics
  • Economics & Finance
  • World
  • Arts & Books
  • Life
  • Science
  • Philosophy
  • Subscribe
  • Events
  • Home
  • Magazine

Was communism as bad as Nazism?

A debate between Anne Applebaum and Anatol Lieven

by Anne Applebaum / October 20, 2000 / Leave a comment
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Email

Published in October 2000 issue of Prospect Magazine

Dear Anne,

Let me be clear. I hate communism. I am vicariously proud of my great uncle’s fight against the Bolsheviks during the civil war in the Baltic from 1918-20, and of my father’s role in helping to undermine communism as head of the Russian and later the East European Services of the BBC in the 1960s and 1970s. I went as a journalist to report on the Mujahedin fight against Soviet occupation in the late 1980s, and the Baltic independence struggle of the early 1990s, partly as a result of this anti-communist sentiment. And I agree with every word of Nicolas Werth’s recent chronicle of Soviet atrocities in The Black Book of Communism, which destroys for good the left-wing fiction that a line can be drawn between the “good” Lenin and the “wicked” Stalin.

But I also agree with Werth in rejecting the new conventional wisdom-represented in the Black Book by St?ane Courtois-which asserts that communism was worse than Nazism. Courtois argues that there is an essential similarity between communism and Nazism, and then, by comparing the number of alleged victims, comes up with a neat figure of 95m dead for communism against 25m for Nazism. Ergo, communism must have been worse.

Courtois’s approach has four main flaws. First, it blurs the distinction between directly-willed actions and unintended consequences. The Soviet famine of 1921-2 was a consequence of the revolution and civil war, but it was not willed by the Bolsheviks, who even sought western aid. However, its victims are simply added by Courtois to those of the artificially created Ukrainian/Cossack famine of 1932-33. Second, there is a dangerous looseness in Courtois’s use of the word “genocide”-a looseness characteristic of the old hard left. Third, Courtois fails to examine the very different nature of communist and Nazi ideology, above all on issues of race and nationality. Marxism preaches the common progress of mankind towards communism, which could not be more different from the Nazi be…

YOU’VE HIT THE LIMIT

You have now reached your limit of 3 free articles in the last 30 days.
But don’t worry! You can get another 7 articles absolutely free, simply by entering your email address in the box below.

When you register we’ll also send you a free e-book—Writing with punch—which includes some of the finest writing from our archive of 22 years. And we’ll also send you a weekly newsletter with the best new ideas in politics and philosophy of culture, which you can of course unsubscribe from at any time







Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with our newsletter, subscription offers and other relevant information.

Click to learn more about these interests and how we use your data. You will be able to object to this processing on the next page and in all our communications.

20048123365c68c5f30238d8.80012726

Go to comments

Related articles

Vikings Heading for Land by Frank Dicksee 1873 Source: Wkimedia commons
Europe's messy violent past—and confused present
Zoe Apostolides / October 15, 2018
Simon Jenkins's new history of Europe is peppered with counter-intuitive takes
The Ashers “gay cake” verdict is a victory for freedom of expression
Peter Tatchell / October 12, 2018
The law should not force businesses to take political standpoints
Share with friends
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Email

Comments

  1. Jerzy Bialowas
    March 29, 2013 at 18:34
    V.good Anne. I agree with you 100%. I just wanted to add the communism would be still alive in Poland and the rest of the eastern Europe but it run out of steam. What I mean was lack of food!. That was one of the main reasons the communists gave up power. The polish pope helped too. Jerzy Bialowas
  2. Ilya
    June 11, 2013 at 03:59
    Dear Anatol, I can assure you that Sakharov and most other members of dissident Soviet intelligentsia from the 80's would support Anne's position (including many WW2 veterans), not yours. Unfortunately "Russophobia" that you seem to denounce has been well-deserved, as the trajectory Russia has been following after the fall of the SU so amply demonstrates. Also what you seem to miss is the fact that Nazism was a local and completely irrational, even random - and thus necessarily short-lived - ideology and regime, as opposed to an all-pervasive, all-too-seductive global evil of Communism. Nazism is not scalable, so to say, whereas Communism is. Nazism is gone for good, but C. is alive and well, always reinventing itself. So which one is more dangerous? Dear Anne, I am amazed, and even a little relieved (though not by much - this is a losing battle) you are as prominent as this (I have jumped to this site from some "deep thinkers" list where your rank - while not comparable to El Baradei's - is still high.) I still have a copy of Gulag with your inscription.
  3. Jacob Field
    February 20, 2016 at 16:24
    Nazism came from Communism., The concentration camps were copied from Gulags. Some would say being gassed to death is less painful than being starved to death, both are evil in my view. Communists killed far more than Nazism and lasted much longer. Most of the poverty in the world is a result of Marxist polices one way or another. So communism was far worse than the short evil of Nazism. Remember the USSR invaded Poland with the Nazi, no USSR no Nazi party.
  4. Stenka Razin
    May 4, 2016 at 01:05
    Nazism was much worse than communism. Nazis managed to massacre only 6 million Jews (my people) in 1930s–940s, not speaking of damage they caused to neigbouring countries. By contrast, the whole Stalin repressions took the toll of 4–5 million, out of which 1/3 were executed. I quote the official Soviet data. Please, don't write that you have better information – you can't, since no other exists, what you have is speculation people (so-called British scholars never been in the Soviet Union) like to blindly believe in. Russophobia is basically the same as antisemitism. All apologies were given. It's not the fault of Russia that some countries continue to live under 'Russian' or 'communist occupation' even 25 years after.
    1. Simon
      September 12, 2017 at 12:28
      But Mao killed about 60 million people, because of starvation and executions. Communism is ALOT worse than nazism.

Prospect's free newsletter

The big ideas that are shaping our world—straight to your inbox. PLUS a free e-book and 7 articles of your choosing on the Prospect website.

Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with our newsletter, subscription offers and other relevant information. Click here to learn more about these purposes and how we use your data. You will be able to opt-out of further contact on the next page and in all our communications.

This Month's Magazine

Perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus.

Prospect is the leading magazine of ideas. Each month it is packed with the finest writing on politics, culture, economics and ideas. Subscribe today and join the debate.

Subscribe

Most Popular

  • Read
  • Commented

The invigorating strangeness of Friedrich Nietzsche

The naïve optimism of Liam Fox

Why I bet £1000 that a no-deal Brexit will trigger recession

Labour's Remainers could be a ticking time bomb for the party

The Duel: Has modern architecture ruined Britain?

Ruling out no deal is the wrong sort of red line

6 Comments

The Conservative Party has a problem—it’s no longer conservative

5 Comments

The overlooked dynamic at the heart of the Brexit “culture war”

2 Comments

Arlene Foster’s DUP still holds the balance of power in Westminster—so what’s their next move?

2 Comments

The impact of Brexit on services has not received nearly enough attention

2 Comments

About this author

Anne Applebaum
Anne Applebaum is a Pulitzer-winning author and journalist
  • Follow Anne on:
  • Twitter
More by this author

More by Anne Applebaum

Does Eastern Europe still exist?
March 20, 2013
Europe's only fan?
October 19, 2011
Goodbye to all that
May 20, 1999

Next Prospect events

  • Details

    Prospect Book Club—Diarmaid MacCulloch

    London, 2019-05-20

  • Details

    Prospect Book Club—Sue Prideaux

    2019-04-15

  • Details

    Prospect Book Club—Andrew Roberts

    2019-03-14

See more events

Sponsored features

  • Reforming the pension system to work for the many

  • Putting savers in the driving seat: getting the pensions dashboard right

  • To fix the housing crisis we need fresh thinking

  • Tata Steel UK: Driving innovation for the future of mobility

  • The road to zero

PrimeTime

The magazine is owned and supported by the Resolution Group, as part of its not-for-profit, public interest activities.

Follow us
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • RSS

Editorial

Editor: Tom Clark
Deputy Editor: Steve Bloomfield
Managing Editor (Arts & Books): Sameer Rahim
Head of Digital: Stephanie Boland
Deputy Digital Editor (Political Correspondent): Alex Dean
Creative Director: Mike Turner
Production Editor & Designer: Chris Tilbury
US Writer-at-Large: Sam Tanenhaus

Commercial

Commercial Director: Alex Stevenson
Head of Marketing: Paul Mortimer
Marketing and Circulations Executive: James Hawkins
Programme Coordinator: Oliver James Ward
Head of Advertising Sales: Adam Kinlan 020 3372 2934
Senior Account Manager: Dominic Slonecki 0203 372 2972

  • Home
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Acceptable Use Policy
© Prospect Publishing Limited
×
Login
Login with your subscriber account:
You need a valid subscription to login.
I am
Remember Me


Forgotten password?

Or enter with social networking:
Login to post comments using social media accounts.
  • With Twitter
  • Connect
  • With Google +
×
Register Now

Register today and access any 7 articles on the Prospect’s website for FREE in the next 30 days..
PLUS find out about the big ideas that will shape our world—with Prospect’s FREE newsletter sent to your inbox. We'll even send you our e-book—Writing with punch—with some of the finest writing from the Prospect archive, at no extra cost!

Not Now, Thanks

Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with our newsletter, subscription offers and other relevant information.

Click to learn more about these interests and how we use your data. You will be able to object to this processing on the next page and in all our communications.

×
You’ve got full access!

It looks like you are a Prospect subscriber.

Prospect subscribers have full access to all the great content on our website, including our entire archive.

If you do not know your login details, simply close this pop-up and click 'Login' on the black bar at the top of the screen, then click 'Forgotten password?', enter your email address and press 'Submit'. Your password will then be emailed to you.

Thank you for your support of Prospect and we hope that you enjoy everything the site has to offer.

This site uses cookies to improve the user experience. By using this site, you agree that we can set and use these cookies. For more details on the cookies we use and how to manage them, see our Privacy and Cookie Policy.