Most mysticism is, in scientific terms, mush. Yet the mystic's experience of wonder may in fact be the same animating spirit that lies behind scienceby Anthony Gottlieb / April 20, 2003 / Leave a comment
Published in April 2003 issue of Prospect Magazine
Book: Rational Mysticism
Author: John Horgan
Price: (Houghton Mifflin, $25)
A British Zen Buddhist once observed that Robert Pirsig’s ‘Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance’ cannot be about Zen, because “Zen isn’t about anything.” The Buddhist did have a point. If mystical experience is, by definition, ineffable, how much can you say about it?
The term “mysticism” has been applied to a broad family of both religious and secular oddities that are to be found in most known cultures-although at some times more than others. In the history of philosophy, the third to fifth centuries AD stand out as uncharacteristically dominated by occult attempts at spiritual transcendence. Closer to our own times, a small renaissance of mysticism took hold some 30 years ago. John Horgan, a distinguished American science journalist, who has now turned his attention to the topic, notes that in the 1970s “everybody I knew seemed to be reading ‘Siddhartha’, ‘Be Here Now’, ‘The Doors of Perception’, ‘The Teachings of Don Juan’, and other mystical texts. Everybody was pursuing mystical epiphanies-satori, kensho, nirvana, samadhi, the opening of the third eye-through transcendental meditation, kundalini yoga, LSD, or all of the above.” High times for mysticism indeed-of which the new age movements of the 1990s may be seen as a faint but commercialised echo.